Varying Trends In The Financial Viability Of US Rural Hospitals, 2011-17

被引:48
作者
Bai, Ge [1 ,2 ]
Yehia, Farah [3 ]
Chen, Wei [4 ]
Anderson, Gerard F. [2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Carey Business Sch, Accounting, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Int Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Ctr Hosp Finance & Management, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
PERFORMANCE; NONPROFIT; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01545
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The financial viability of rural hospitals has been a matter of serious concern, with ongoing closures affecting rural residents' access to medical services. We examined the financial viability of 1,004 US rural hospitals that had consistent rural status in 2011-17. The median overall profit margin improved for nonprofit critical access hospitals (from 2.5 percent to 3.2 percent) but declined for other hospitals (from 3.0 percent to 2.6 percent for nonprofit non-critical access hospitals, from 3.2 percent to 0.4 percent for for-profit critical access hospitals, and from 5.7 percent to 1.6 percent for for-profit non-critical access hospitals). Occupancy rate and charge markup were positively associated with overall margins: In 2017 hospitals with low versus high occupancy rates had median overall profit margins of 0.1 percent versus 4.7 percent, and hospitals with low versus high charge markups had median overall margins of 1.8 percent versus 3.5 percent. Rural hospital financial viability deteriorated in states that did not expand eligibility for Medicaid and was lower in the South. Rural hospitals that closed during the study period had a median overall profit margin of -3.2 percent in their final year before closure. Policy makers should compare the incremental cost of providing essential services between hospitals and other settings to balance access and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 948
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Market Power: Price Variation Among Commercial Insurers For Hospital Services [J].
Bai, Ge ;
Anderson, Gerard F. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2018, 37 (10) :1615-1622
[2]   US Hospitals Are Still Using Chargemaster Markups To Maximize Revenues [J].
Bai, Ge ;
Anderson, Gerard F. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2016, 35 (09) :1658-1664
[3]   A More Detailed Understanding Of Factors Associated With Hospital Profitability [J].
Bai, Ge ;
Anderson, Gerard F. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2016, 35 (05) :889-897
[4]   Extreme Markup: The Fifty US Hospitals With The Highest Charge-To-Cost Ratios [J].
Bai, Ge ;
Anderson, Gerard F. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2015, 34 (06) :922-928
[5]   What Is Rural? Challenges And Implications Of Definitions That Inadequately Encompass Rural People And Places [J].
Bennett, Kevin J. ;
Borders, Tyrone F. ;
Holmes, George M. ;
Kozhimannil, Katy Backes ;
Ziller, Erika .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2019, 38 (12) :1985-1992
[6]  
Census Bureau, SMALL AR HLTH INS ES
[7]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2019, CRIT ACC HOSP
[8]  
CMS.gov, 2020, HOSP 2552 2010
[9]  
Government Accountability Office, 2018, Rural hospital closures: number and characteristics of affected hospitals and contributing factors report
[10]   Trends in Emergency Department Use by Rural and Urban Populations in the United States [J].
Greenwood-Ericksen, Margaret B. ;
Kocher, Keith .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (04) :e191919