Introducing the Education Technology Value Evaluation Tool for Schools

被引:0
作者
Saubern, Ralph [1 ]
Taylor-Guy, Pauline [2 ]
van der Keij, Fabienne [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Council Educ Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Australian Council Educ Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ASSESSMENT AND LEARNING, ICAL | 2022年
关键词
educational technology; evaluation; evidence-based learning; ICT;
D O I
10.1109/ICAL50372.2022.10075589
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Despite the enthusiasm for technology in school education, the importance attributed to it by policymakers, educators, students and parents, and the extensive impact of the changes in practices and provision related to the adoption of digital technologies, research has provided little evidence that the adoption of digital technologies has led to improved outcomes for learners. Given the significant, ongoing investment in technology and research evidence that technology has potential to improve learning outcomes, it is timely for education systems and schools to have access to tools and frameworks that can support effective use of technology in education. This paper introduces the Education Technology Value Evaluation Tool, a set of frameworks designed to help teachers and school leaders focus on the ways in which educational technology can be used to address student learning needs and drive learning improvement. This tool was developed based on a review of the literature on effective use of technology and evidence from practice from ACER system and school reviews in Australia. It provides a simple, structured approach to highlighting learning related goals for technology adoptions, defining metrics for success and establishing criteria for ongoing evaluation. It is envisaged that this framework will support schools to focus their resources and efforts in using technology to drive improved outcomes for all students.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Angeli C., 2016, Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators, V2nd, P21
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, FUTURES LEARNING
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, PISA 2018 Results(Volume VI): Are Students Ready to Thrive in an In- terconnected World?, DOI DOI 10.1787/D5F68679-EN
[4]   Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the Construct "Just Right?" [J].
Brantley-Dias, Laurie ;
Ertmer, Peggy A. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2013, 46 (02) :103-128
[5]  
Bulman G, 2016, HBK ECON, V5, P239, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-63459-7.00005-1
[6]  
Davis F. D., 2022, TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANC
[7]  
De Bortoli L., 2014, ICILS 2013 AUSTR STU
[8]   Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect [J].
Ertmer, Peggy A. ;
Ottenbreit-Leftwich, Anne T. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2010, 42 (03) :255-284
[9]   Virtually No Effect? Different Uses of Classroom Computers and their Effect on Student Achievement [J].
Falck, Oliver ;
Mang, Constantin ;
Woessmann, Ludger .
OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2018, 80 (01) :1-38
[10]   Under pressure and overlooked: the impact of COVID-19 on teachers in NSW public schools [J].
Fray, Leanne ;
Jaremus, Felicia ;
Gore, Jennifer ;
Miller, Andrew ;
Harris, Jess .
AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2023, 50 (03) :701-727