Effects of Cardiac Motion on 3D Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Carotid Arteries

被引:1
作者
Jeffery, Dean [1 ,2 ]
Emery, Derek J. [2 ]
Wilman, Alan H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Biomed Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2V2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Radiol & Diagnost Imaging, Edmonton, AB T6G 2V2, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
contrast-enhanced MR angiography; carotid artery; cardiac pulsation; translation; carotid motion; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.22657
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the effect of cardiac-related carotid artery motion on the image quality of 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) in patients presenting with suspected carotid artery disease. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with suspected carotid artery disease underwent cardiac-gated cinematic steady-state free precession of the carotid arteries followed by standard 3D CEMRA at 1.5 T. Using postprocessing, computer programs determined the degree of vessel wall dilation and translation across the cardiac cycle from the cinematic exam and related this to vessel wall sharpness in 3D CEMRA, which was determined objectively by computer analysis and subjectively by a panel of expert neuroradiologists. Results: In patients, across 40 arteries the average carotid vessel movement due to cardiac pulsation was 0.36 +/- 0.17 mm and translation 1.53 +/- 0.94 mm. When using computer analysis of sharpness, the mean carotid wall motion had a weak negative correlation with 3D CEMRA vessel sharpness (Pearson's correlation -0.23, P < 0.01). However, the same trend was not present from the radiological review. Conclusion: In standard 3D CEMRA in patients with suspected carotid artery disease, cardiac-related carotid movement was a statistically significant source of degradation in vessel sharpness, but did not appear to be clinically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Simultaneous Noncontrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage (SNAP) Imaging: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography for Measuring Carotid Stenosis [J].
Shu, Hongge ;
Sun, Jie ;
Hatsukami, Thomas S. ;
Balu, Niranjan ;
Hippe, Daniel S. ;
Liu, Haining ;
Kohler, Ted R. ;
Zhu, Wenzhen ;
Yuan, Chun .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 46 (04) :1045-1052
[42]   Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in severe carotid stenosis: meta-analysis with metaregression of different techniques [J].
Menke, Jan .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (09) :2204-2216
[43]   Carotid artery stenosis:: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography [J].
Sundgren, PC ;
Sundén, P ;
Lindgren, A ;
Lanke, J ;
Holtås, S ;
Larsson, EM .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 2002, 44 (07) :592-599
[44]   Investigation of the Longitudinal Relaxation Rate of Blood After Gadobenate Dimeglumine Administration Sequence Optimization, Dynamic Acquisition, and Clinical Impact for Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Carotid Arteries [J].
Neira, Cristina ;
Anzidei, Michele ;
Napoli, Alessandro ;
Kirchin, Miles A. ;
Marincola, Beatrice Cavallo ;
Zaccagna, Fulvio ;
Catalano, Carlo ;
Passariello, Roberto ;
Tedoldi, Fabio .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2011, 46 (12) :774-782
[45]   Scan-Rescan Reproducibility of Carotid Bifurcation Geometry From Routine Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography [J].
Bijari, Payam B. ;
Antiga, Luca ;
Wasserman, Bruce A. ;
Steinman, David A. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (02) :482-489
[46]   Ultra-Low-Dose, Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Carotid Arteries at 3.0 Tesla [J].
Lohan, Derek G. ;
Tomasian, Anderanik ;
Saleh, Roya S. ;
Singhal, Aparna ;
Krishnam, Mayd S. ;
Finn, J. Paid .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2009, 44 (04) :207-217
[47]   3D non-contrast-enhanced ECG-gated MR angiography of the lower extremities with dual-source radiofrequency transmission at 3.0 T: Intraindividual comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography in PAOD patients [J].
Rasper, Michael ;
Wildgruber, Moritz ;
Settles, Marcus ;
Eckstein, Hans-Henning ;
Zimmermann, Alexander ;
Reeps, Christian ;
Rummeny, Ernst J. ;
Huber, Armin M. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (09) :2871-2880
[48]   Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis [J].
Babiarz, L. S. ;
Romero, J. M. ;
Murphy, E. K. ;
Brobeck, B. ;
Schaefer, P. W. ;
Gonzalez, R. G. ;
Lev, M. H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2009, 30 (04) :761-768
[49]   Combination of 2D sensitivity encoding and 2D partial Fourier techniques for improved acceleration in 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography [J].
Hu, HCH ;
Madhuranthakam, AJ ;
Kruger, DG ;
Glockner, JF ;
Riederer, SJ .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2006, 55 (01) :16-22
[50]   Low-Dose 3D Time-Resolved Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of the Supraaortic Arteries: Correlation With High Spatial Resolution 3D Contrast-Enhanced MRA [J].
Lee, Youn-Joo ;
Laub, Gerhard ;
Jung, So-Lyung ;
Yoo, Won-Jong ;
Kim, Young-Joo ;
Ahn, Kook-Jin ;
Kim, Bum-Soo .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (01) :71-76