The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health

被引:80
作者
Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh [1 ]
Khordastan, Firoozeh [2 ]
Fatehi, Farhad [3 ,4 ]
Samzadeh, Hamidreza [5 ]
Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz [6 ]
机构
[1] Kerman Univ Med Sci, Med Informat Res Ctr, Inst Futures Studies Hlth, Kerman, Iran
[2] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Dept Med Informat, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Kerman Univ Med Sci, Fac Management & Med Informat Sci, Dept Hlth Informat Sci, Kerman, Iran
[6] Kerman Univ Med Sci, Gastroenterol & Hepatol Res Ctr, Inst Basic & Clin Physiol Sci, Kerman, Iran
关键词
Mobile health; Questionnaire; Evaluation;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Various questionnaires are used for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health (mHealth) services. Using the best one to meet the needs of an mHealth study is a challenge for researchers. Therefore, this study aimed to review and determine the frequently used questionnaires for evaluating the mentioned outcomes of mHealth services. Methods The PubMed database was searched for conducting this review in April 2021. Papers that used a referenced questionnaire to evaluate the satisfaction, usability, acceptance, or quality outcomes of mHealth were included. The first author's name, year of publication, evaluation outcome, and evaluation questionnaire were extracted from relevant papers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results In total, 247 papers were included in the study. Questionnaires were used for usability (40%), quality (34.5%), acceptance (8.5%), and satisfaction (4%) outcomes, respectively. System usability scale (36.5%), mobile application rating scale (35.5%), post study system usability questionnaire (6%), user mobile application rating scale (5%), technology acceptance model (4.5%), computer system usability questionnaire (2.5%), net promoter score (2%), health information technology usability evaluation scale (2%), the usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use (1.5%), client satisfaction questionnaire (1.5%), unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (1.5%), questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction (1%), user experience questionnaire (1%), and after-scenario questionnaire (1%) were the most used questionnaires, respectively. Conclusion Despite the existence of special questionnaires for evaluating several outcomes of mHealth, general questionnaires with fewer items and higher reliability have been used more frequently. Researchers should pay more attention to questionnaires with a goal-based design.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]  
Singh K, 2017, KEY ADVANCES IN CLINICAL INFORMATICS: TRANSFORMING HEALTH CARE THROUGH HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, P183, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-809523-2.00013-3
[32]   Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) [J].
Stoyanov, Stoyan R. ;
Hides, Leanne ;
Kavanagh, David J. ;
Wilson, Hollie .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2016, 4 (02) :589-593
[33]   Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps [J].
Stoyanov, Stoyan R. ;
Hides, Leanne ;
Kavanagh, David J. ;
Zelenko, Oksana ;
Tjondronegoro, Dian ;
Mani, Madhavan .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2015, 3 (01)
[34]  
Swaid S, 2017, AHFE
[35]   Validation of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) [J].
Terhorst, Yannik ;
Philippi, Paula ;
Sander, Lasse B. ;
Schultchen, Dana ;
Paganini, Sarah ;
Bardus, Marco ;
Santo, Karla ;
Knitza, Johannes ;
Machado, Gustavo C. ;
Schoeppe, Stephanie ;
Bauereiss, Natalie ;
Portenhauser, Alexandra ;
Domhardt, Matthias ;
Walter, Benjamin ;
Krusche, Martin ;
Baumeister, Harald ;
Messner, Eva-Maria .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (11)
[36]   User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view [J].
Venkatesh, V ;
Morris, MG ;
Davis, GB ;
Davis, FD .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2003, 27 (03) :425-478
[37]   Usability of Mobile Applications: A Systematic Literature Study [J].
Weichbroth, Pawel .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :55563-55577
[38]  
World Health Organization, 2011, Global observatory for eHealth Series, P6
[39]  
Yen Po-Yin, 2010, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, V2010, P917
[40]   The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study [J].
Zhou, Leming ;
Bao, Jie ;
Setiawan, I. Made Agus ;
Saptono, Andi ;
Parmanto, Bambang .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2019, 7 (04)