Computational modeling of pulverized coal fired boilers - A review on the current position

被引:82
作者
Sankar, G. [1 ]
Kumar, D. Santhosh [1 ]
Balasubramanian, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Bharat Heavy Elect Ltd, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Devolatilization; Char combustion; NOx prediction; Reactor network models; RADIATIVE HEAT-TRANSFER; FLUID DYNAMIC SIMULATIONS; DROP TUBE FURNACE; FLY-ASH; UNBURNED CARBON; NITRIC-OXIDE; COMBUSTION CHARACTERISTICS; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; CHAR COMBUSTION; UTILITY BOILER;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.154
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Computational modeling of pulverized coal fired boilers has made considerable advances in the past 5 decades. Modeling the furnace of a coal-fired boiler is a complex task. Even though bulk of the heat transfer to the furnace water walls is by radiation, it is complicated by the presence of ash and other tri-atomic gases that participate in radiation. It is also necessary to accurately capture the kinetics of the devolatilization, char combustion and volatile combustion processes. The phenomenon of fluid flow is equally important since considerable amount of turbulence is involved. Any model developed for the prediction of critical performance parameters like furnace outlet gas temperature and pollutant emission levels will need to capture this multifarious nature of combustion inside a boiler furnace. While computationally expensive CFD codes are available in plenty, researchers have also developed simpler but effective reactor network models. This review explains the current research position in the computational modeling of pulverized coal fired boilers from the following perspectives i) Coal combustion modeling ii) Radiation modeling iii) Overall furnace model development.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 665
页数:23
相关论文
共 191 条
[1]   A review of the kinetics of the nitric oxide carbon reaction [J].
Aarna, I ;
Suuberg, EM .
FUEL, 1997, 76 (06) :475-491
[2]   A reactivity study of chars obtained at different temperatures in relation to their petrographic characteristics [J].
Alonso, MJG ;
Borrego, AG ;
Alvarez, D ;
Menéndez, A .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 69 (03) :257-272
[3]  
Amundson NR, 1981, DEFG2178ET10158
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, FUEL, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00104-1
[5]   RAPID DEVOLATILIZATION AND HYDROGASIFICATION OF BITUMINOUS COAL [J].
ANTHONY, DB ;
HOWARD, JB ;
HOTTEL, HC ;
MEISSNER, HP .
FUEL, 1976, 55 (02) :121-128
[6]   A comparison of different methods for predicting coal devolatilisation kinetics [J].
Arenillas, A ;
Rubiera, F ;
Pevida, C ;
Pis, JJ .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 2001, 58 :685-701
[7]   Prediction of ignition behavior in a tangentially fired pulverized coal boiler using CFD [J].
Asotani, T. ;
Yamashita, T. ;
Tominaga, H. ;
Uesugi, Y. ;
Itaya, Y. ;
Mori, S. .
FUEL, 2008, 87 (4-5) :482-490
[8]   Modelling pulverised coal combustion using a detailed coal combustion model [J].
Backreedy, RI ;
Fletcher, LM ;
Ma, L ;
Pourkashanian, M ;
Williams, A .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 178 (04) :763-787
[9]   Prediction of unburned carbon and NOx in a tangentially fired power station using single coals and blends [J].
Backreedy, RI ;
Jones, JM ;
Ma, L ;
Pourkashanian, M ;
Williams, A ;
Arenillas, A ;
Arias, B ;
Pis, JJ ;
Rubiera, F .
FUEL, 2005, 84 (17) :2196-2203
[10]   An extended coal combustion model [J].
Backreedy, RI ;
Habib, R ;
Jones, JM ;
Pourkashanian, M ;
Williams, A .
FUEL, 1999, 78 (14) :1745-1754