Purification and characterization of membrane-bound quinoprotein quinate dehydrogenase

Several bacterial strains carrying quinoprotein quinate dehydrogenase (QDH) were screened through acetic acid bacteria and other bacteria. Strong enzyme activity was found in the membrane fraction of Gluconobacter melanogenus IFO 3294, G. oxydans IFO 3292, G. oxydans IFO 3244, and some strains of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus. Interestingly, in the membrane fraction of A. calcoaceticus AC3, which is unable to produce pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ), fairly large amounts of apo-QDH were formed, and were converted to holo-QDH only by the addition of PQQ. It was difficult to detach PQQ from the holo-QDH by EDTA treatment, and EDTA treatment with apo-QDH prior to PQQ addition gave no significant bolo-QDH. For QDH purification, Gluconobacter strains were not suitable due to the presence of huge amounts of quinohemoprotein alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) in the same membrane, which was co-solubilized with QDH and disturbed purification of QDH. Purification of holo-QDH was done with Acinetobacter sp. SA1 instead, which contained no ADH. Apo-QDH was purified from A. aclcoaceticus AC3. This is the first report dealing with QDH purification, and two different criteria of QDH purification were given. A combination of two steps using butyl-Toyopearl and hydroxyapatite columns gave a highly purified holo-QDH which was monodispersed and showed enough purity, though the specific activity did not increase as much as expected. When QDH purification was done with A. calcoaceticus AC3 in the absence of PQQ, purified apo-QDH appeared to be a dimer, which was converted to the monomer on addition of PQQ. Since QDH was highly hydrophobic, one-step chromatography on a DEAE-Sepharose column was tried. Purified holo-QDH of higher specific activity was obtained with a higher yield. The molecular mass of QDH was estimated to be 88 kDa. There was no characteristic absorption spectrum with the purified QDH except for a small bump around 420 run. QDH oxidized only quinate and shikimate so far examined. The optimal QDH activity was found at pH 6-7 when assayed with artificial electron acceptors. QDH was formed in the presence or absence of quinate in the culture medium, although stronger induction was usually observed in the presence of quinate.