Raman scattering peak position of Cu(In, Ga)Se2 film to predict its near-surface [Ga] / ([Ga] plus [In]) and open-circuit voltage

被引:6
作者
Chantana, Jakapan [1 ]
Hironiwa, Daisuke [1 ]
Watanabe, Taichi [2 ]
Teraji, Seiki [2 ]
Kawamura, Kazunori [2 ]
Minemoto, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Ritsumeikan Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Kusatsu, Shiga 5258577, Japan
[2] Nitto Denko Corp, Environm & Energy Res Ctr, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
Copper indium gallium selenide; Solar cells; Near-surface [Ga] / ([Ga] plus [In]); Raman scattering peak position; Open-circuit voltage; CU(IN; GA)SE-2; SOLAR-CELLS; THIN-FILMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsf.2014.10.097
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Cu(In, Ga)Se-2 (CIGS) solar cells were fabricated on both rigid soda-lime glass (SLG) and flexible stainless steel (SUS) substrates. Their absorbers, with several [Ga] /([Ga] + [In]) profiles, were deposited using the so-called "multi-layer precursor method", consisting of Ga-Se/In-Se/Cu-Se stacked precursors. It was revealed that the open-circuit voltage (V-OC) of the CIGS solar cell is well correlated with the near-surface GGI, defined as the average [Ga] /([Ga] + [In]) ratio within 200 nm of the CIGS surface. The near-surface GGI could be predicted when the Raman scattering peak position of the CIGS film was known. The estimated penetration depth of Raman scattering light into the CIGS layer was approximately 100-140 nm from its surface. Moreover, a relationship between VOC and the Raman scattering peak position was observed. Ultimately, the Raman scattering peak position, corresponding to the near-surface GGI of below 0.45, could be utilized as an indicator of VOC of CIGS solar cells on both rigid SLG and flexible SUS substrates without cell fabrication, which is measured by the rapid and non-destructive method. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 10
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Vibrational and crystalline properties of polymorphic CuInC2 (C=Se,S) chalcogenides -: art. no. 054303
    Alvarez-García, J
    Barcones, B
    Pérez-Rodríguez, A
    Romano-Rodríguez, A
    Morante, JR
    Janotti, A
    Wei, SH
    Scheer, R
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2005, 71 (05):
  • [2] [Anonymous], APPL PHYS LETT
  • [3] Relationship between open-circuit voltage in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cell and peak position of (220/204) preferred orientation near its absorber surface
    Chantana, J.
    Watanabe, T.
    Teraji, S.
    Kawamura, K.
    Minemoto, T.
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2013, 103 (22)
  • [4] Determination of open-circuit voltage in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cell by averaged Ga/(In + Ga) near its absorber surface
    Chantana, J.
    Murata, M.
    Higuchi, T.
    Watanabe, T.
    Teraji, S.
    Kawamura, K.
    Minemoto, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2013, 114 (08)
  • [5] Investigation of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 absorber by time-resolved photoluminescence for improvement of its photovoltaic performance
    Chantana, Jakapan
    Hironiwa, Daisuke
    Watanabe, Taichi
    Teraji, Seiki
    Kawamura, Kazunori
    Minemoto, Takashi
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2014, 130 : 567 - 572
  • [6] Impact of Ga/(In plus Ga) profile in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 prepared by multi-layer precursor method on its cell performance
    Chantana, Jakapan
    Murata, Masashi
    Higuchi, Takashi
    Watanabe, Taichi
    Teraji, Seiki
    Kawamura, Kazunori
    Minemoto, Takashi
    [J]. THIN SOLID FILMS, 2014, 556 : 499 - 502
  • [7] Chirila A, 2013, NAT MATER, V12, P1107, DOI [10.1038/NMAT3789, 10.1038/nmat3789]
  • [8] Chirila A, 2011, NAT MATER, V10, P857, DOI [10.1038/nmat3122, 10.1038/NMAT3122]
  • [9] Influence of iron on defect concentrations and device performance for Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells on stainless steel substrates
    Eisenbarth, Tobias
    Caballero, Raquel
    Kaufmann, Christian A.
    Eicke, Axel
    Unold, Thomas
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2012, 20 (05): : 568 - 574
  • [10] Solar cell efficiency tables (version 43)
    Green, Martin A.
    Emery, Keith
    Hishikawa, Yoshihiro
    Warta, Wilhelm
    Dunlop, Ewan D.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2014, 22 (01): : 1 - 9