Interocular Symmetry and Repeatability of Central Corneal Thickness and Corneal Endothelial Cell Morphology and Density in Healthy Eyes of Congolese

被引:1
作者
Kelekele, Joseph-Theodore [1 ]
Lubeji, David L. Kayembe [1 ]
Mwanza, Jean-Claude [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Kinshasa, Dept Ophthalmol, Kinshasa, DEM REP CONGO
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Ophthalmol, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
Central corneal thickness; corneal endothelial cell density; interocular symmetry; repeatability; non-contact specular microscopy; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RELIABILITY; KERATOCONUS;
D O I
10.1080/08820538.2021.1974497
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To determine the limits of normal interocular symmetry and the repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) and endothelial cell morphology and density. Methods Two hundred and seventy-eight subjects (age: 10.9-80.7 years) with healthy eyes were studied. CCT as well as endothelial cell morphology and density were measured by non-contact specular microscopy. Three measurements were obtained per eye per participant. Upper and lower tolerance limits of normal interocular symmetry were defined as the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the interocular differences in CCT, endothelial cell density (CECD), coefficient of variation (CoV), hexagonality, and cell size. Repeatability was determined using the intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC), the coefficient of variation (CV), and the test-retest variability standard deviation (TRTSD). Results The mean interocular differences were -1.05 +/- 17.5 mu m (p = .32) for CCT and 0.5 +/- 90.8 cells/mm(2) (p = .76) for CECD. The 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the interocular differences were -13.9 and 15.4 mu m for CCT and -177.4 cells/mm(2) to 182.0 cells/mm(2) for CECD. Only interocular difference in CoV correlated weakly with age (r = -0.22, P < .001). ICCs were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96, P < .001) for CCT and 0.95 (0.94-0.96, P < .001) for CECD. CV and TRTSD were 1.2% +/- 5.3% and 4.4 +/- 3.4 mu m for CCT and 2.4% +/- 3.9% and 17.7 +/- 7.7 cells/mm(2) for CECD, respectively. Conclusions CCT and CECD showed good repeatability and interocular symmetry in normal Congolese subjects. Absolute interocular differences in CCT and CECD exceeding 15.5 mu m and 182 cells/mm(2), respectively, should be considered suspicious and investigated. When comparing two intrasession measurements from the same eye, a difference of approximately 4.5 mu m in CCT and 18 cells/mm(2) or greater may be considered statistically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison Between Laser Scanning In Vivo Confocal Microscopy and Noncontact Specular Microscopy in Assessing Corneal Endothelial Cell Density and Central Corneal Thickness
    Salvetat, Maria Letizia
    Zeppieri, Marco
    Miani, Flavia
    Parisi, Lucia
    Felletti, Mirella
    Brusini, Paolo
    CORNEA, 2011, 30 (07) : 754 - 759
  • [32] Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Physiological Central Corneal Thickness in Healthy Myopic Eyes
    Behesht-Nejad, Amir-Houshang
    Ghaffari, Reza
    Moghimi, Sasan
    Jabbarvand, Mahmood
    Hajilaari, Abolghasem
    Zare, Mohammad-Ali
    Bashiri, Abasat
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 21 (02): : 19 - 24
  • [33] A Comparative Study of Corneal Endothelial Cell Count and Central Corneal Thickness in Emmetropia and Axial Myopia
    Panjwani, Vandana
    Daigavane, Sachin
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2020, 9 (44): : 3300 - 3304
  • [34] Manifestations of type 2 diabetes in corneal endothelial cell density,corneal thickness and intraocular pressure
    Stella Briggs
    Uchechukwu L Osuagwu
    Essam M AlHarthi
    TheJournalofBiomedicalResearch, 2016, 30 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [35] Relationship of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy Severity to Central Corneal Thickness
    Kopplin, Laura J.
    Przepyszny, Katie
    Schmotzer, Brian
    Rudo, Karen
    Babineau, Denise C.
    Patel, Sanjay V.
    Verdier, David D.
    Jurkunas, Ula
    Iyengar, Sudha K.
    Lass, Jonathan H.
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 130 (04) : 433 - 439
  • [36] Manifestations of type 2 diabetes in corneal endothelial cell density, corneal thickness and intraocular pressure
    Briggs, Stella
    Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L.
    AlHarthi, Essam M.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 30 (01): : 46 - 51
  • [37] Normal Corneal Thickness and Endothelial Cell Density in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta)
    Casanova, M. Isabel
    Young, Laura J.
    Park, Sangwan
    Kim, Soohyun
    Roszak, Karolina
    Leonard, Brian C.
    Blandino, Andrew
    Motta, Monica J.
    Yiu, Glenn
    Li, Jennifer Y.
    Moshiri, Ala
    Thomasy, Sara M.
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 11 (09):
  • [38] Corneal endothelial morphology and central thickness in patients with type II diabetes mellitus
    Riemens, Anjo
    Missotten, Tom
    Baarsma, Seerp
    Vidovic-Valentincic, Natasa
    Novac-Andrejcic, Katrina
    Erckens, Roel
    Kuijpers, Robert
    Lokhorst, Henk
    Rothova, Aniki
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2014, 92 (02) : E159 - E160
  • [39] Correlation between Corneal Endothelial Cell Density and Central Ocular Surface Temperature in Normal and Keratoconus Eyes
    Nemeth, Orsolya
    Langenbucher, Achim
    Eppig, Timo
    Lepper, Sabine
    Milioti, Georgia
    Abdin, Aladin
    Nagy, Zoltan Zsolt
    Seitz, Berthold
    Szentmary, Nora
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2021, 46 (04) : 445 - 451
  • [40] Interocular Symmetry of Vascular Density and Association with Central Macular Thickness of Healthy Adults by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
    Liu, Guodong
    Keyal, Khusbu
    Wang, Fang
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7