Perceptual skill, radiology expertise, and visual test performance with NINA and WALDO

被引:83
作者
Nodine, CF
Krupinski, EA
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Radiol, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词
diagnostic radiology; observer performance;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(98)80295-X
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The goal of this study was to determine if radiologists possess superior visual search and analysis skills compared with those of laypeople. Materials and Methods. In two experiments, radiologists and laypeople searched one of two complex pictorial scenes for hidden targets. Eye position was recorded during the search. Two measures of performance were obtained:: accuracy of detecting targets as measured by using alternative free response receiver operating characteristic analysis and visual search efficiency as measured by using eye position analysis. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in detection performance between radiologists and le for either of the search tasks. Radiologists took longer on average to search the images and to first fixate on the targets than did the laypeople. For both groups, true-positive and false-positive decisions were associated ger dwell times than true-negative decisions. As with radiology search tasks, false-negative decisions were also associated with longer dwell times than true-negative decisions. Conclusion. Performance on two visual search and detection tasks indicate that radiologists do not possess superior visual skills compared with laypeople. Radiology expertise is more likely to be a combination of specific visual and cognitive skills derived from medical training and experience in detecting and determining the diagnostic importance of radiographic findings.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 612
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   VISUAL SKILL - CORRELATION WITH DETECTION OF SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULES [J].
BASS, JC ;
CHILES, C .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (09) :994-998
[2]   Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists - Findings from a national sample [J].
Beam, CA ;
Layde, PM ;
Sullivan, DC .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (02) :209-213
[3]   MEASUREMENT AND PREDICTION OF DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE DURING RADIOLOGY TRAINING [J].
BERBAUM, KS ;
SMOKER, WRK ;
SMITH, WL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1985, 145 (06) :1305-1311
[4]   PERCEPTION TESTING IN SURGICAL PATHOLOGY [J].
BERBAUM, KS ;
PLATZ, C .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1988, 19 (10) :1127-1131
[5]   FREE-RESPONSE METHODOLOGY - ALTERNATE ANALYSIS AND A NEW OBSERVER-PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENT [J].
CHAKRABORTY, DP ;
WINTER, LHL .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (03) :873-881
[6]   Diagnostic radiology in an integrated curriculum: Experience from the United Arab Emirates [J].
Ekelund, L ;
Lanphear, J .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1997, 4 (09) :653-656
[7]   MEDICAL-STUDENTS WHO CHOOSE A RADIOLOGY ELECTIVE - CAREER DECISIONS, MOTIVATIONS, AND INTENTIONS [J].
FREUNDLICH, IM ;
MURPHY, WA .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1995, 2 (06) :527-532
[8]  
GALE AG, 1990, BRIT J RADIOL, V63, pS52
[9]  
HANDFORD M, 1991, WHERES WALDO MAGNIFI
[10]  
HIRSCHFELD A, 1970, WORLD HIRSCHFELD