Vertical guided bone regeneration with bioabsorbable barriers

被引:54
作者
Llambes, Fernando [1 ]
Silvestre, Francisco-Javier
Caffesse, Raul
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Dept Oral Med & Oral Surg, E-46003 Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Nuevo Leon, Dept Periodont, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
关键词
collagen; grafts; membranes; regeneration;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2007.070017
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a very useful surgical technique to increase limited alveolar bone for implant placement. The use of non-resorbable barriers is well established; however, bio-absorbable collagen membranes may simplify the surgical technique and make it more predictable. Methods: Vertical ridge augmentation was performed on I I patients at the time of implant placement. The part of the implant out of bone was covered with autogenous bone/graft, and a slow-resorption collagen membrane was placed on top. Gingival tissues were closed with horizontal mattress and interrupted sutures. Second-stage surgery was performed 4 to 6 months later and healing abutments were placed. The length of the implant out of bone was determined at stage I and stage 2 surgeries on a periapical x-ray I year after implant load. Histology was obtained from one of the cases at second-stage surgery. Results: Measurements revealed that the mean implant out of bone was 3.5 mm at stage I and 0.5 mm at stage 2. Mean bone gain was 3 mm, which represented 83% of the exposed implant at stage 1. One year after loading, implants showed a mean marginal bone loss of 1.4 mm. Minimal complications were detected, and only one case failed. Histology from one successful case showed new trabecular bone with large cellular marrow spaces in the regenerated area. Conclusion: Slow-resorption collagen membranes have the potential to promote vertical ridge augmentation when used with autogenous bone at the time of implant placement.
引用
收藏
页码:2036 / 2042
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ADELL R, 1990, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V5, P233
[2]  
Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11
[3]  
Albrektsson T O, 1994, Periodontol 2000, V4, P58, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00006.x
[4]  
Armitage G C, 1999, Ann Periodontol, V4, P1, DOI 10.1902/annals.1999.4.1.1
[5]   Evaluation of filling materials in membrane-protected bone defects - A comparative histomorphometric study in the mandible of miniature pigs [J].
Buser, D ;
Hoffmann, B ;
Bernard, JP ;
Lussi, A ;
Mettler, D ;
Schenk, RK .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (03) :137-150
[6]  
Colangelo P, 1993, Implant Dent, V2, P101, DOI 10.1097/00008505-199305000-00007
[7]   The effect of different membranes on onlay bone graft success in the dog mandible [J].
Dongieux, JW ;
Block, MS ;
Morris, G ;
Gardiner, D ;
Dean, K .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1998, 86 (02) :145-151
[8]   Histologic analysis of alveolar bone following guided bone regeneration [J].
Ersanli, S ;
Olgac, V ;
Leblebicioglu, B .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 75 (05) :750-756
[9]   Observations on a new collagen barrier membrane in 16 consecutively treated patients. Clinical and histological findings [J].
Friedmann, A ;
Strietzel, FP ;
Maretzki, B ;
Pitaru, S ;
Bernimoulin, JP .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (11) :1616-1623
[10]   Guided bone regeneration at oral implant sites [J].
Hammerle, CHF ;
Karring, T .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 1998, 17 :151-175