Isolating human brain functional connectivity associated with a specific cognitive process

被引:1
作者
Silver, Michael A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Landau, Ayelet N. [3 ,4 ]
Lauritzen, Thomas Z. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Prinzmetal, William [4 ]
Robertson, Lynn C. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Helen Wills Neurosci Inst, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Optometry, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Henry H Wheeler Jr Brain Imaging Ctr, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Redwood Ctr Theoret Neurosci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
HUMAN VISION AND ELECTRONIC IMAGING XV | 2010年 / 7527卷
关键词
fMRI; functional connectivity; coherency; visual attention; voluntary attention; visual cortex; occipital cortex; parietal cortex; SPATIAL ATTENTION; FLUCTUATIONS;
D O I
10.1117/12.849120
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure functional connectivity among brain areas has the potential to identify neural networks associated with particular cognitive processes. However, fMRI signals are not a direct measure of neural activity but rather represent blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals. Correlated BOLD signals between two brain regions are therefore a combination of neural, neurovascular, and vascular coupling. Here, we describe a procedure for isolating brain functional connectivity associated with a specific cognitive process. Coherency magnitude (measuring the strength of coupling between two time series) and phase (measuring the temporal latency differences between two time series) are computed during performance of a particular cognitive task and also for a control condition. Subtraction of the coherency magnitude and phase differences for the two conditions removes sources of correlated BOLD signals that do not modulate as a function of cognitive task, resulting in a more direct measure of functional connectivity associated with changes in neuronal activity. We present two applications of this task subtraction procedure, one to measure changes in strength of coupling associated with sustained visual spatial attention, and one to measure changes in temporal latencies between brain areas associated with voluntary visual spatial attention.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   ENHANCEMENT OF PERCEPTUAL SENSITIVITY AS THE RESULT OF SELECTIVELY ATTENDING TO SPATIAL LOCATIONS [J].
BASHINSKI, HS ;
BACHARACH, VR .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1980, 28 (03) :241-248
[2]   Separating respiratory-variation-related neuronal-activity-related fluctuations in fluctuations from fMRI [J].
Birn, RM ;
Diamond, JB ;
Smith, MA ;
Bandettini, PA .
NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 31 (04) :1536-1548
[3]   Tracking cognitive processes with functional MRI mental chronometry [J].
Formisano, E ;
Goebel, R .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (02) :174-181
[4]   Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex [J].
Gandhi, SP ;
Heeger, DJ ;
Boynton, GM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (06) :3314-3319
[5]   Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses [J].
Handwerker, DA ;
Ollinger, JM ;
D'Esposito, M .
NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 21 (04) :1639-1651
[6]   Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation [J].
Kastner, S ;
Pinsk, MA ;
De Weerd, P ;
Desimone, R ;
Ungerleider, LG .
NEURON, 1999, 22 (04) :751-761
[7]  
Landau, 2008, TUTORIALS VISUAL COG, P43
[8]   Top-down flow of visual spatial attention signals from parietal to occipital cortex [J].
Lauritzen, Thomas Z. ;
D'Esposito, Mark ;
Heeger, David J. ;
Silver, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (13)
[9]   Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal [J].
Logothetis, NK ;
Pauls, J ;
Augath, M ;
Trinath, T ;
Oeltermann, A .
NATURE, 2001, 412 (6843) :150-157
[10]   Interpreting the BOLD signal [J].
Logothetis, NK ;
Wandell, BA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 66 :735-769