DO PUBLIC SMOKING BANS HAVE AN IMPACT ON ACTIVE SMOKING? EVIDENCE FROM THE UK

被引:37
作者
Jones, Andrew M. [1 ]
Laporte, Audrey [2 ]
Rice, Nigel [3 ,4 ]
Zucchelli, Eugenio [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Econ & Related Studies DERS, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat HPME, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ CHE, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ York, Dept Econ & Related Studies DERS, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Lancaster, Fac Hlth & Med FHM, Div Hlth Res DHR, Lancaster LA1 4YG, England
关键词
smoking behaviour; smoking bans; policy evaluation; BHPS; SELF-REPORTED SMOKING; FREE LEGISLATION; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; WORKPLACE SMOKING; HEALTH; TAXES; HOSPITALIZATIONS; INEQUALITIES; EXPOSURE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1002/hec.3009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The literature on the effects of public smoking bans on smoking behaviour presents conflicting results and there is limited evidence on their impact on active smoking. This paper evaluates the impact of smoking bans on active smoking using data from the British Household Panel Survey and exploiting the policy experiment provided by the differential timing of the introduction of the bans in Scotland and England. We assess the short-term impact of the smoking bans by employing a series of flexible difference-in-differences fixed effects panel data models. We find that the introduction of the public smoking bans in England and Scotland had limited short-run effects on both smoking prevalence and the total level of smoking. Although we identify significant differences in trends in smoking consumption across the survey period by population sub-groups, we find insufficient evidence to conclude that these were affected by the introduction of the smoking bans. These results challenge those found in the public health literature but are in line with the most recent strand of economic literature indicating that there is no firm evidence on the effects of smoking bans on smoking. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 192
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program
    Abadie, Alberto
    Diamond, Alexis
    Hainmueller, Jens
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 105 (490) : 493 - 505
  • [2] Short-run economic effects of the Scottish smoking ban
    Adda, Jerome
    Berlinski, Samuel
    Machin, Stephen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 36 (01) : 149 - 154
  • [3] Taxes, cigarette consumption, and smoking intensity
    Adda, Jerome
    Cornaglia, Francesca
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (04) : 1013 - 1028
  • [4] Market Regulation and Firm Performance: The Case of Smoking Bans in the United Kingdom
    Adda, Jerome
    Berlinski, Samuel
    Machin, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2012, 55 (02) : 365 - 391
  • [5] The Effect of Bans and Taxes on Passive Smoking
    Adda, Jerome
    Cornaglia, Francesca
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2010, 2 (01) : 1 - 32
  • [6] Changes in child exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (CHETS) study after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland: national cross sectional survey
    Akhtar, Patricia C.
    Currie, Dorothy B.
    Currie, Candace E.
    Haw, Sally J.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 335 (7619): : 545 - +
  • [7] The burden of smoking-related ill health in the UK
    Allender, S.
    Balakrishnan, R.
    Scarborough, P.
    Webster, P.
    Rayner, M.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2009, 18 (04) : 262 - 267
  • [8] One last puff? Public smoking bans and smoking behavior
    Anger, Silke
    Kvasnicka, Michael
    Siedler, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2011, 30 (03) : 591 - 601
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2011, The Oxford handbook of health economics
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2010, OECD HLTH DAT 2010