Assessing the Utility of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors over a 12-Week Period in the Cuyama Valley of California

被引:105
作者
Mukherjee, Anondo [1 ,2 ]
Stanton, Levi G. [1 ]
Graham, Ashley R. [1 ]
Roberts, Paul T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sonoma Technol Inc, 1450 N McDowell Blvd,Suite 200, Petaluma, CA 94954 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
low-cost sensors; performance evaluation; air quality monitoring; pollution; particulate matter; AIR-POLLUTION; QUALITY; NETWORK; DEVICES;
D O I
10.3390/s17081805
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The use of low-cost air quality sensors has proliferated among non-profits and citizen scientists, due to their portability, affordability, and ease of use. Researchers are examining the sensors for their potential use in a wide range of applications, including the examination of the spatial and temporal variability of particulate matter (PM). However, few studies have quantified the performance (e.g., accuracy, precision, and reliability) of the sensors under real-world conditions. This study examined the performance of two models of PM sensors, the AirBeam and the Alphasense Optical Particle Counter (OPC-N2), over a 12-week period in the Cuyama Valley of California, where PM concentrations are impacted by wind-blown dust events and regional transport. The sensor measurements were compared with observations from two well-characterized instruments: the GRIMM 11-R optical particle counter, and the Met One beta attenuation monitor (BAM). Both sensor models demonstrated a high degree of collocated precision (R-2 = 0.8-0.99), and a moderate degree of correlation against the reference instruments (R-2 = 0.6-0.76). Sensor measurements were influenced by the meteorological environment and the aerosol size distribution. Quantifying the performance of sensors in real-world conditions is a requisite step to ensuring that sensors will be used in ways commensurate with their data quality.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Alphasense Ltd, 2015, US MAN OPC N2 OPT PA
  • [2] [Anonymous], AEROSOL SCI TECHNOL
  • [3] Comparative Analysis of Monitoring Devices for Particulate Content in Exhaust Gases
    Castellani, Beatrice
    Morini, Elena
    Filipponi, Mirko
    Nicolini, Andrea
    Palombo, Massimo
    Cotana, Franco
    Rossi, Federico
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (07) : 4287 - 4307
  • [4] EPA, NAAQS TABL
  • [5] EPA, STAND OP PROC CONT M
  • [6] EPA, LIST DES REF EQ METH
  • [7] A distributed network of low-cost continuous reading sensors to measure spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 in Xi'an, China
    Gao, Meiling
    Cao, Junji
    Seto, Edmund
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2015, 199 : 56 - 65
  • [8] GRIMM Aerosol Technik GmbH & Co, 2016, GRIMM PORT AER SPECT
  • [9] Hall E.S., 2014, AM J ENV ENG, V4, P147, DOI DOI 10.5923/J.AJEE.20140406.02
  • [10] Hinds WC., 1999, Aerosol Technology, Properties, Behavior and Measurement of Airborne Particles, DOI [10.1016/0021-8502(83)90049-6, DOI 10.1016/0021-8502(83)90049-6]