Likelihood of repeat abortion in a Swedish cohort according to the choice of post-abortion contraception: a longitudinal study

被引:37
作者
Kilander, Helena [1 ,2 ]
Alehagen, Siw [1 ]
Svedlund, Linnea [1 ]
Westlund, Karin [3 ]
Thor, Johan [4 ]
Brynhildsen, Jan [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jonkoping, Region Jonkopin, Sweden
[3] Vrinnevis Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Norrkoping, Sweden
[4] Jonkoping Univ, Jonkoping Acad Improvement Hlth & Welf, Jonkoping, Sweden
[5] Linkoping Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Linkoping, Sweden
[6] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Long-acting reversible contraception; post-abortion contraception; repeat abortion; subdermal implant; termination of pregnancy; ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION; PREGNANCY; IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.12874
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionDespite high access to contraceptive services, 42% of the women who seek an abortion in Sweden have a history of previous abortion(s). The reasons for this high repeat abortion rate remain obscure. The objective of this study was to study the choice of contraceptive method after abortion and related odds of repeat abortions within 3-4 years. Material and methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study based on a medical record review at three hospitals in Sweden. We included 987 women who had an abortion during 2009. We reviewed medical records from the date of the index abortion until the end of 2012 to establish the choice of contraception following the index abortion and the occurrence of repeat abortions. We calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI. ResultsWhile 46% of the women chose oral contraceptives, 34% chose long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC). LARC was chosen more commonly by women with a previous pregnancy, childbirth and/or abortion. During the follow-up period, 24% of the study population requested one or more repeat abortion(s). Choosing LARC at the time of the index abortion was associated with fewer repeat abortions compared with choosing oral contraceptives (13% vs. 26%, OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.24-0.52). Subdermal implant was as effective as intrauterine device in preventing repeat abortions beyond 3 years. ConclusionsChoosing LARC was associated with fewer repeat abortions over more than 3 years of follow up.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 571
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   Early versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Abortion - A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Saav, Ingrid ;
Stephansson, Olof ;
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11)
[22]   The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception [J].
Secura, Gina M. ;
Allsworth, Jenifer E. ;
Madden, Tessa ;
Mullersman, Jennifer L. ;
Peipert, Jeffrey F. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (02) :115.e1-115.e7
[23]  
Socialstyrelsen National Board of Health and Welfare, 2014, STAT IND AB 2014
[24]  
Socialstyrelsen [The National board for Health and Welfare], 2005, DIFF COSTS DIFF TYP
[25]   The potential of long-acting reversible contraception to decrease unintended pregnancy [J].
Speidel, J. Joseph ;
Harper, Cynthia C. ;
Shields, Wayne C. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2008, 78 (03) :197-200
[26]  
Svensk forening for Ostetrik och Gynekologi [Swedish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology], 2009, MED GUID IND AB
[27]  
Trussell J., 2012, CONTRACEPTION
[28]   Contraceptive failure in the United States [J].
Trussell, James .
CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 83 (05) :397-404
[29]   Understanding contraceptive failure [J].
Trussell, James .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 23 (02) :199-209
[30]  
Winner B, 2012, NEW ENGL J MED, V366, P1998, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1110855