Microscope Sterility During Spine Surgery

被引:25
作者
Bible, Jesse E. [1 ]
O'Neill, Kevin R. [1 ]
Crosby, Colin G. [1 ]
Schoenecker, Jonathan G. [1 ]
McGirt, Matthew J. [1 ]
Devin, Clinton J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Vanderbilt Orthopaed Inst, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
contamination; infection; microscope; spine; sterility; WOUND-INFECTION; OPERATING-THEATER; RISK-FACTORS; LUMBAR-DISK; ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY; CONTAMINATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MANAGEMENT; FUSION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182286129
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Prospective study. Objective. Assess the contamination rates of sterile microscope drapes after spine surgery. Summary of Background Data. The use of the operating microscope has become more prevalent in certain spine procedures, providing superior magnification, visualization, and illumination of the operative field. However, it may represent an additional source of bacterial contamination and increase the risk of developing a postoperative infection. Methods. This study included 25 surgical spine cases performed by a single spine surgeon that required the use of the operative microscope. Sterile culture swabs were used to obtain samples from 7 defined locations on the microscope drape after its use during the operation. The undraped technician's console was sampled in each case as a positive control, and an additional 25 microscope drapes were swabbed immediately after they were applied to the microscope to obtain negative controls. Swab samples were assessed for bacterial growth on 5% sheep blood Columbia agar plates using a semiquantitative technique. Results. No growth was observed on any of the 25 negative control drapes. In contrast, 100% of preoperative and 96% of postoperative positive controls demonstrated obvious contamination. In the postoperative group, all 7 sites of evaluation were found to be contaminated with rates of 12% to 44%. Four of the 7 evaluated locations were found to have significant contamination rates compared with negative controls, including the shafts of the optic eyepieces on the main surgeon side (24%, P = 0.022), "forehead" portion on both the main surgeon (24%, P = 0.022) and assistant sides (28%, P = 0.010), and "overhead" portion of the drape (44%, P = 0.0002). Conclusion. Bacterial contamination of the operative microscope was found to be significant after spine surgery. Contamination was more common around the optic eyepieces, likely due to inadvertent touching of unsterile portions. Similarly, all regions above the eyepieces also have a propensity for contamination because of unknown contact with unsterile parts of the surgeon. Therefore, we believe that changing gloves after making adjustments to the optic eyepieces and avoid handling any portion of the drape above the eyepieces may decrease the risks of intraoperative contamination and possibly postoperative infection as well.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 627
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] CONTAMINATION OF IRRIGATION SOLUTIONS IN AN OPERATING-THEATER
    ANDERSSON, BM
    LIDGREN, L
    SCHALEN, C
    STEEN, A
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1984, 5 (07) : 339 - 341
  • [2] BAIRD RA, 1984, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P129
  • [3] Sterility of C-arm fluoroscopy during spinal surgery
    Biswas, Debdut
    Bible, Jesse E.
    Whang, Peter G.
    Simpson, Andrew K.
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    [J]. SPINE, 2008, 33 (17) : 1913 - 1917
  • [4] Intraoperative bacterial contamination in operations for joint replacement
    Davis, N
    Curry, A
    Gambhir, AK
    Panigrahi, H
    Walker, CRC
    Wilkins, EGL
    Worsley, MA
    Kay, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (05): : 886 - 889
  • [5] Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery
    Fang, A
    Hu, SS
    Endres, N
    Bradford, DS
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (12) : 1460 - 1465
  • [6] Herruzo-Cabrera R., 1992, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V13, P639, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199211000-00006
  • [7] Hussein JR, 2001, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V83, P353
  • [8] Management of postoperative infections after spinal instrumentation
    Levi, ADO
    Dickman, CA
    Sonntag, VKH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1997, 86 (06) : 975 - 980
  • [9] MASSIE JB, 1992, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P99
  • [10] Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations
    Olsen, Margaret A.
    Nepple, Jeffrey J.
    Riew, Daniel
    Lenke, Lawrence G.
    Bridwell, Keith H.
    Mayfield, Jennie
    Fraser, Victoria J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (01) : 62 - 69