mild Interlaminar Decompression for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Procedure Description and Case Series With 1-year Follow-up

被引:19
|
作者
Wong, Wade H. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN | 2012年 / 28卷 / 06期
关键词
spine; lumbar; decompression; mild; stenosis; BACK-PAIN; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; LAMINOTOMY; SURGERY; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/AJP.0b013e31823aaa9d
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: mild interlaminar decompression is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. This report describes the mild procedure and presents 1-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with mild. Methods: mild treats lumbar spinal stenosis by removing portions of the lamina and ligamentum flavum to restore space in the lumbar spine. The procedure is conducted under fluoroscopic guidance, and is performed with moderate sedation. One-year follow-up was obtained for 17 patients treated with the mild procedure. Clinical evaluations were conducted at baseline and at 1-year follow-up with the 10-point Visual Analog Score and Oswestry Disability Index. Results: mild treatments were completed with no major device-related or procedure-related complications. The baseline mean Visual Analog Score of 7.6 improved at 1 year after the procedure to 2.3, a decrease of 5.4 cm points, or an average percentage decrease of 70.0%. Average baseline Oswestry Disability Index of 48.4 improved to 21.7 at 1 year, an improvement of 26.6 points. Discussion: The mild technique provides an attractive early option for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis after failed injection therapy, but before more invasive surgical treatment. For 17 patients with 1-year follow-up, the mild procedure provided significant pain relief and increased mobility. This procedure leaves no implants behind, and therefore does not limit subsequent, more invasive procedures that require implants.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 538
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Outcome of Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD) for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study
    Hatta, Yoichiro
    Tonomura, Hitoshi
    Nagae, Masateru
    Takatori, Ryota
    Mikami, Yasuo
    Kubo, Toshikazu
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 3 (01): : 54 - 60
  • [2] Evaluation of Decompression and Interlaminar Stabilization Compared with Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 5-year Follow-up of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Musacchio, Michael J.
    Lauryssen, Carl
    Davis, Reginald J.
    Bae, Hyun W.
    Peloza, John H.
    Guyer, Richard D.
    Zigler, Jack E.
    Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
    Leary, Scott
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 10
  • [3] Indirect decompression with lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: minimum 1-year MRI follow-up
    Shimizu, Takayoshi
    Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
    Otsuki, Bungo
    Murata, Koichi
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 33 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [4] What is the treatment effect of surgery compared with nonoperative treatment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis at 1-year follow-up?
    Held, Ulrike
    Steurer, Johann
    Pichierri, Giuseppe
    Wertli, Maria M.
    Farshad, Mazda
    Brunner, Florian
    Guggenberger, Roman
    Porchet, Francois
    Fekete, Tamas F.
    Schmid, Urs D.
    Gravestock, Isaac
    Burgstaller, Jakob M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (02) : 185 - 193
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Compared With Transforaminal Route Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal stenosis: Minimum 1-year Follow-up
    Sun, Weixiang
    Wang, Jie
    Hu, Yafei
    Tao, Jinzhuo
    Yang, Chengwu
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2025, 18 : 1071 - 1080
  • [6] Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis - Five-year follow-up
    Jolles, BM
    Porchet, F
    Theumann, N
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (07): : 949 - 953
  • [7] A four year follow-up of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
    Adamova, B.
    Vohanka, S.
    Dusek, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2005, 12 : 154 - 154
  • [8] mild (R) Lumbar Decompression for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Schomer, D. F.
    Solsberg, D.
    Wong, W.
    Chopko, B. W.
    NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 24 (04): : 620 - 626
  • [9] Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated with Adjacent Segment Disease following Lumbar Fusion Surgery: 5-year Follow-up of a Retrospective Case Series
    Murata, Shizumasa
    Minamide, Akihito
    Nakagawa, Yukihiro
    Iwasaki, Hiroshi
    Taneichi, Hiroshi
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Simpson, Andrew K.
    Yamada, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 83 (05) : 403 - 410
  • [10] Effectiveness and Factors Associated with Epidural Decompression and Adhesiolysis Using a Balloon-Inflatable Catheter in Chronic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 1-Year Follow-Up
    Choi, Seong-Soo
    Lee, Jong-Hyuk
    Kim, Doohwan
    Kim, Hyun Kyu
    Lee, Sohee
    Song, Kyo Joon
    Park, Jin Kyu
    Shim, Jae Hang
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (03) : 476 - 487