University efficiency and public funding for higher education in Bulgaria

被引:23
作者
Tochkov, Kiril [1 ]
Nenovsky, Nikolay [2 ,3 ]
Tochkov, Karin [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas Christian Univ, Ft Worth, TX 76129 USA
[2] Univ Picardie, CRIISEA, F-80025 Amiens, France
[3] Univ Orleans, STUDIUM LEO, F-45067 Orleans, France
[4] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
PERFORMANCE; DEPARTMENTS; RESOURCES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1080/14631377.2012.729306
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The recent pressure on public finances in Bulgaria has exposed the need for a performance-based system of public funding for higher education. This article estimates the relative technical and cost efficiency of Bulgarian universities and explores the correlation between public funding and efficiency levels. In particular, a recent government proposal to use university rankings for the allocation of funds is evaluated with regard to efficiency. The results indicate that public universities are less efficient than private institutions, especially in teaching-related aspects. A larger share of the education market, fewer fields of study and more science-related majors result in efficiency gains. Efficiency is not a significant determinant of the amounts of subsidy allocated to a university, while the rankings of efficiency and funding are found to be negatively correlated. However, the rankings to be used under the proposed policy are positively related to cost efficiency, suggesting that the reform effort is a step in the right direction.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 534
页数:18
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]   University Efficiency: A Comparison and Consolidation of Results from Stochastic and Non-stochastic Methods [J].
McMillan, Melville ;
Chan, Wing .
EDUCATION ECONOMICS, 2006, 14 (01) :1-30
[22]  
Middlehurst Robert., 2004, The Role of Transnational, Private, and For-Profit Provision in Meeting Global Demand for Tertiary Education: Mapping, Regulation and Impact
[23]   Efficiency and productivity growth in Chinese universities during the post-reform period [J].
Ng, Ying Chu ;
Li, Sung-ko .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 20 (02) :183-192
[24]   Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models [J].
Simar, L ;
Wilson, PW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (01) :49-61
[25]  
Smith J., 2000, EC J ROYAL EC SOC VO, V110, P382
[26]   Funding system of full-time higher education and technical efficiency: case of the University of Ljubljana [J].
Tajnikar, Maks ;
Debevec, Jasmina .
EDUCATION ECONOMICS, 2008, 16 (03) :289-303
[27]   Measuring Efficiencies of Academic Departments within a College [J].
Tauer, Loren W. ;
Fried, Harold O. ;
Fry, William E. .
EDUCATION ECONOMICS, 2007, 15 (04) :473-489
[28]  
Worthington A.C., 2001, EDUC ECON, V9, P245, DOI DOI 10.1080/09645290110086126
[29]   Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998-2003 [J].
Worthington, Andrew C. ;
Lee, Boon L. .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2008, 27 (03) :285-298