Criteria for the Replacement of Restorations: Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section

被引：43

作者：

Wilson, N. H. F. ^{[1
]}

Lynch, C. D. ^{[2
]}

Brunton, P. A. ^{[3
]}

Hickel, R. ^{[4
]}

Meyer-Lueckel, H. ^{[5
]}

Gurgan, S. ^{[6
]}

Pallesen, U. ^{[7
]}

Shearer, A. C. ^{[8
]}

Tarle, Z. ^{[9
]}

Cotti, E. ^{[10
]}

Vanherle, G. ^{[11
]}

Opdam, N. ^{[12
]}

机构：

[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Dent, London, England

[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Dent, Coll Biomed & Life Sci, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales

[3] Univ Otago, Fac Dent, Sir John Walsh Res Inst, Dunedin, New Zealand

[4] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Operat Dent Periodontol & Paediat Dent, Munich, Germany

[5] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Operat Dent Periodontol & Prevent Dent, Aachen, Germany

[6] Hacettepe Univ, Restorat Dent, Ankara, Turkey

[7] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Odontol, Copenhagen, Denmark

[8] NHS Educ Scotland, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland

[9] Sch Dent Med, Dept Endodont & Restorat Dent, Zagreb, Croatia

[10] Univ Cagliari, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Cagliari, Italy

[11] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Sch Dent, Leuven, Belgium

[12] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Prevent & Restorat Dent, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands

来源：

OPERATIVE DENTISTRY | 2016年 / 41卷

关键词：

WORLD DENTAL FEDERATION; COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS; CLINICAL-CRITERIA; RECOMMENDATIONS; REPAIR; EXAMPLES; SCHOOLS; UPDATE; CARIES;

D O I：

10.2341/15-058-O

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

The replacement of a restoration is one of the most common procedures in dentistry. However, the criteria for such intervention, excluding catastrophic failure and persistent discomfort and pain, continue to be the subject of considerable debate. The decision-making process remains subjective on the part of the treating clinician, while the evidence base for refurbishment and repair rather than replacement for the management of defective and failing restorations continues to grow and strengthen. This article, prepared as an Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section consensus publication, reviews existing criteria for the replacement of restorations and encourages practitioners to shift, if not already doing so, to considering the replacement of a restoration as a last resort rather than as a prudent action to be taken if in any doubt about clinical acceptability. Further research in the area, spanning the risk assessment of defective and failing restorations and new diagnostic tools and processes, together with work to enhance the evidence base of restoration repair vs replacement, would be of immense value.

引用

页码：S48 / S57

页数：10

共 29 条

[1] Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials [J].