Mean Value-Based Parallel Collaborative Optimization Method for Modular Aircraft Structural Layout

被引:0
作者
Xu, Chao [1 ]
Yao, Weixing [2 ]
Zhou, Danfa [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Key Lab Fundamental Sci Natl Def Adv Design Techn, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, State Key Lab Mech & Control Mech Struct, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Electromech Engn Inst, Shanghai 201109, Peoples R China
关键词
structure optimization; collaborative optimization; modular aircraft; layout optimization; two-stage optimization method; DESIGN; SHAPE;
D O I
10.3390/aerospace9100557
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The conventional structural layout optimization method is usually used to solve the layout optimization problem of a single structure, but it is difficult to apply to the layout optimization problem of the modular aircraft structure containing multiple substructures. Therefore, this paper proposes the mean value-based parallel collaborative optimization method (MVPM) for modular aircraft structural layout. This method is a two-stage optimization method based on decomposition. The basic idea of the MVPM is decomposing the layout optimization problem of the modular aircraft structure into a system coordination problem and several independent subsystem optimization problems by introducing coordination variables. The subsystem optimizes each aircraft structure. Under the constraints of the structure itself, the performance of each structure is better, and the shared variables are as close to the coordination variables as possible. The system coordination adjusts the coordination variables according to the optimization results of each subsystem. With constant iteration between the system and subsystems, the shared variables of each subsystem eventually agree with the coordination variables. The numerical test results show that the MVPM has high optimization efficiency and stability.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Bendsoe M.P., 2009, P 32 AIAAASMEASCEAHS, P684
  • [2] Braun RD, 1997, SIAM PROC S, P98
  • [3] Dimitri B., 2016, NONLINEAR PROGRAMMIN
  • [4] Duan B.Y., 1986, ENG OPTIMIZ, V10, P183, DOI [10.1080/03052158608902536, DOI 10.1080/03052158608902536]
  • [5] Quantitative platform selection in optimal design of product families, with application to automotive engine design
    Fellini, Ryan
    Kokkolaras, Michael
    Papalambros, Panos Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2006, 17 (05) : 429 - 446
  • [6] Funk J.E., 2006, P 44 AIAA AEROSPACE, DOI [10.2514/6.2006-1514, DOI 10.2514/6.2006-1514]
  • [7] Layout optimization of trusses using improved GA methodologies
    Hasançebi, O
    Erbatur, F
    [J]. ACTA MECHANICA, 2001, 146 (1-2) : 87 - 107
  • [8] Jiao J, 2007, J INTELL MANUF, V18, P5, DOI 10.1007/s10845-007-0003-2
  • [9] Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria
    Jin, R
    Chen, W
    Simpson, TW
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2001, 23 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [10] Jun Z., 2016, SENSITIVITY BASED CO