Effect of a Mammography Screening Decision Aid for Women 75 Years and Older A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:48
作者
Schonberg, Mara A. [1 ]
Kistler, Christine E. [2 ,3 ]
Pinheiro, Adlin [1 ]
Jacobson, Alicia R. [1 ]
Aliberti, Gianna M. [1 ]
Karamourtopoulos, Maria [1 ]
Hayes, Michelle [2 ,3 ]
Neville, Bridget A. [4 ]
Lewis, Carmen L. [5 ,6 ]
Wee, Christina C. [1 ]
Fagerlin, Angela [7 ,8 ]
Nekhlyudov, Larissa [9 ]
Marcantonio, Edward R. [1 ]
Hamel, Mary Beth [1 ]
Davis, Roger B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Gen Med, 1309 Beacon,Off 219, Boston, MA 02446 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Med, Div Geriatr Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Family Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Aurora, CO USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Adult & Child Consortium Outcomes Res & Delivery, Aurora, CO USA
[7] Univ Utah, Dept Populat Hlth, Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[8] US Dept Vet Affairs, Hlth Serv Res & Dev, Informat Decis Enhancement & Analyt Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[9] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; LIFE EXPECTANCY; RISK; PREFERENCES; VALIDATION; MORTALITY; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0440
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Guidelines recommend that women 75 years and older be informed of the benefits and harms of mammography before screening. Objective To test the effects of receipt of a paper-based mammography screening decision aid (DA) for women 75 years and older on their screening decisions. Design, Setting, and Participants A cluster randomized clinical trial with clinician as the unit of randomization. All analyses were completed on an intent-to-treat basis. The setting was 11 primary care practices in Massachusetts or North Carolina. Of 1247 eligible women reached, 546 aged 75 to 89 years without breast cancer or dementia who had a mammogram within 24 months but not within 6 months and saw 1 of 137 clinicians (herein referred to as PCPs) from November 3, 2014, to January 26, 2017, participated. A research assistant (RA) administered a previsit questionnaire on each participant's health, breast cancer risk factors, sociodemographic characteristics, and screening intentions. After the visit, the RA administered a postvisit questionnaire on screening intentions and knowledge. Interventions Receipt of the DA (DA arm) or a home safety (HS) pamphlet (control arm) before a PCP visit. Main Outcomes and Measures Participants were followed up for 18 months for receipt of mammography screening (primary outcome). To examine the effects of the DA, marginal logistic regression models were fit using generalized estimating equations to allow for clustering by PCP. Adjusted probabilities and risk differences were estimated to account for clustering by PCP. Results Of 546 women in the study, 283 (51.8%) received the DA. Patients in each arm were well matched; their mean (SD) age was 79.8 (3.7) years, 428 (78.4%) were non-Hispanic white, 321 (of 543 [59.1%]) had completed college, and 192 (35.2%) had less than a 10-year life expectancy. After 18 months, 9.1% (95% CI, 1.2%-16.9%) fewer women in the DA arm than in the control arm had undergone mammography screening (51.3% vs 60.4%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; P = .006). Women in the DA arm were more likely than those in the control arm to rate their screening intentions lower from previsit to postvisit (69 of 283 [adjusted %, 24.5%] vs 47 of 263 [adjusted %, 15.3%]), to be more knowledgeable about the benefits and harms of screening (86 [adjusted %, 25.5%] vs 32 [adjusted %, 11.7%]), and to have a documented discussion about mammography with their PCP (146 [adjusted %, 47.4%] vs 111 [adjusted %, 38.9%]). Almost all women in the DA arm (94.9%) would recommend the DA. Conclusions and Relevance Providing women 75 years and older with a mammography screening DA before a PCP visit helps them make more informed screening decisions and leads to fewer women choosing to be screened, suggesting that the DA may help reduce overscreening.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 842
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], POPULATION ESTIMATES
[2]  
[Anonymous], BREAST CANC RISK ASS
[3]   Validation of a Preparation for Decision Making scale [J].
Bennett, Carol ;
Graham, Ian D. ;
Kristjansson, Elizabeth ;
Kearing, Stephen A. ;
Clay, Kate F. ;
O'Connor, Annette M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 78 (01) :130-133
[4]   What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? a systematic review [J].
Brouwers, Melissa C. ;
De Vito, Carol ;
Bahirathan, Lavannya ;
Carol, Angela ;
Carroll, June C. ;
Cotterchio, Michelle ;
Dobbins, Maureen ;
Lent, Barbara ;
Levitt, Cheryl ;
Lewis, Nancy ;
McGregor, S. Elizabeth ;
Paszat, Lawrence ;
Rand, Carol ;
Wathen, Nadine .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2011, 6
[5]  
Cancer Query System, SEER INC STAT
[6]  
Cromwell J.T., 2011, Pay for performance in health care: Methods and approaches, VBK-0002-1103
[7]  
Davis T C, 1993, Fam Med, V25, P391
[8]   Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer [J].
Degner, LF ;
Kristjanson, LJ ;
Bowman, D ;
Sloan, JA ;
Carriere, KC ;
ONeil, J ;
Bilodeau, B ;
Watson, P ;
Mueller, B .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (18) :1485-1492
[9]   Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Health Care Systems Using Evidence-Based Interventions [J].
DeGroff, Amy ;
Sharma, Krishna ;
Satsangi, Anamika ;
Kenney, Kristy ;
Joseph, Djenaba ;
Ross, Katherine ;
Leadbetter, Steven ;
Helsel, William ;
Kammerer, William ;
Firth, Rick ;
Rockwell, Tanner ;
Short, William ;
Tangka, Florence ;
Wong, Faye ;
Richardson, Lisa .
PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2018, 15
[10]  
Department of Health and Human Services, RED OV BREAST CERV C