Insurance coverage and socioeconomic differences in patient choice between private and public health care providers in China

被引:33
|
作者
Wang, Qing [1 ]
Zhang, Donglan [2 ]
Hou, Zhiyuan [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Business, 2 Dugong Rd, Panjin 124221, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Georgia, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, 100 Foster Rd,Wright Hall, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social Med, POB 250,138 Yi Xue Yuan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Minist Hlth, Natl Key Lab Hlth Technol Assessment, POB 250,138 Yi Xue Yuan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[5] Fudan Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Social Risks Governance Hl, POB 250,138 Yi Xue Yuan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Health insurance; Socioeconomic status; Outpatient utilization; Ownership; Private providers; China; WAGE COMPARISONS; URBAN CHINA; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.016
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The private health care sector has become an increasingly important complement to China's health care system. During the health care reform in 2009, China's central government established multiple initiatives to-relax constraints on the growth of the private health care sector. However, private health services have not been growing as rapidly as private health care facilities. Using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study collected between 2011 and 2013, this study investigated patient choice between private and public providers for outpatient care and estimated its relationship with health insurance and socioeconomic status (SES). The Heckman sample selection model was applied to address the problem of selection bias caused by a lack of awareness of provider ownership. We found that 82.1% of the outpatient care users were aware of their provider's ownership, and 23.8% chose private health care providers. Although patients with health insurance and higher SES were more likely to be aware of their provider's ownership, they preferred public providers over private providers. For example, having Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance was associated with a 16.5% lower probability of choosing private providers than no health insurance. Respondents with the highest level of household expenditure had a 7.5% lower probability of choosing private providers than those with the lowest level of expenditure. The probability of choosing private providers were significantly lower by 4.0% among respondents with an education level of junior high school and above than those with no formal education. For private providers to play an effective role in the health care system, policies that have constrained the growth of the private sector should be changed, and more effort should be directed toward equalizing health insurance coverage for both types of providers. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 132
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Do premium tax credits increase private health insurance coverage? Evidence from the 2006 Massachusetts health care reform
    Hinde, Jesse M.
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 143 : 121 - 124
  • [42] Quality of diabetes care and health insurance coverage: a retrospective study in an outpatient academic public hospital in Switzerland
    Yves Jackson
    Juan Carlos Lozano Becerra
    Marc Carpentier
    BMC Health Services Research, 16
  • [43] Quality of diabetes care and health insurance coverage: a retrospective study in an outpatient academic public hospital in Switzerland
    Jackson, Yves
    Becerra, Juan Carlos Lozano
    Carpentier, Marc
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 16 : 1 - 7
  • [44] Preferences for public health insurance coverage of new anticancer drugs: a discrete choice experiment among non-small cell lung cancer patients in China
    Meng, Jingyi
    Yan, Feifei
    Chen, Maochun
    Ding, Yuchen
    Feng, Zhe
    Lu, Wenzhang
    Geng, Jinsong
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [45] Patient satisfaction between primary care providers and hospitals: a cross-sectional survey in Jilin province, China
    Li, Jinghua
    Wang, Pingping
    Kong, Xuan
    Liang, Hailun
    Zhang, Xiumin
    Shi, Leiyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 28 (03) : 346 - 354
  • [46] No survival benefit to gaining private health insurance coverage for post-lung transplant care in adults with cystic fibrosis
    Tumin, Dmitry
    Foraker, Randi E.
    Tobias, Joseph D.
    Hayes, Don, Jr.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 30 (03) : 320 - 327
  • [47] Can Private Insurers Stimulate the Function of Public Long-Term Care Insurance? Insights From China
    Yan, Yu
    Faure, Michael G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [48] Going public: Do risk and choice explain differences in caesarean birth rates between public and private places of birth in Australia?
    Miller, Yvette D.
    Prosser, Samantha J.
    Thompson, Rachel
    MIDWIFERY, 2012, 28 (05) : 627 - 635
  • [49] Patients' perceptions of quality in Swedish primary care - a study of differences between private and public ownership
    Andersson, Thomas
    Eriksson, Nomie
    Mullern, Tomas
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 35 (09) : 85 - 100
  • [50] Health insurance coverage in low-income and middle-income countries: progress made to date and related changes in private and public health expenditure
    Hooley, Brady
    Afriyie, Doris Osei
    Fink, Gunther
    Tediosi, Fabrizio
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 7 (05):