Age, sex and individual differences in punishment sensitivity: Factors influencing the feedback-related negativity

被引:80
|
作者
Santesso, Diane L. [1 ]
Dzyundzyak, Angela [1 ]
Segalowitz, Sidney J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brock Univ, Dept Psychol, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
FRN; Adolescence; Anterior cingulate cortex; Punishment sensitivity; Reward sensitivity; Development; Gender; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX; ELECTROCORTICAL RESPONSES; DEVELOPMENTAL DIFFERENCES; BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION; REWARD MAGNITUDE; RISK-TAKING; BRAIN; ADOLESCENT; EMOTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01229.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is central to evaluating performance outcomes and has been linked to individual differences in affective responses to feedback. We used electrophysiological source localization to examine the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and related ACC activity during a gambling task in relation to punishment and reward sensitivity among 16- to 17-year-old adolescents (n = 20) and 18- to 29-year-old adults (n = 30). The FRN was larger for monetary loss compared to win feedback and larger for high relative to low monetary value feedback, with no age differences in the FRN for win or loss feedback. Self-reported sensitivity to punishment accounted for unique variance (over sex and sensitivity to reward) in FRNs, with higher scores relating to larger FRNs and increased rostral ACC activity. These results support the ACC role in experiencing negative performance feedback, especially for individuals highly sensitive to punishment.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1488
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The interplay between feedback-related negativity and individual differences in altruistic punishment: An EEG study
    Hendrik Mothes
    Sören Enge
    Alexander Strobel
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2016, 16 : 276 - 288
  • [2] The interplay between feedback-related negativity and individual differences in altruistic punishment: An EEG study
    Mothes, Hendrik
    Enge, Soeren
    Strobel, Alexander
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 16 (02) : 276 - 288
  • [3] INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE FEEDBACK-RELATED NEGATIVITY ARE ASSOCIATED WITH ALTRUISTIC BEHAVIOR
    Morales, Pablo
    Mayr, Ulrich
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, : 178 - 178
  • [4] Amplitude and latency of feedback-related negativity: aging and sex differences
    Yi, Fei
    Chen, Haiyan
    Wang, Xiang
    Shi, Huqing
    Yi, Jinyao
    Zhu, Xiongzhao
    Yao, Shuqiao
    NEUROREPORT, 2012, 23 (16) : 963 - 969
  • [5] Individual differences in reward-prediction-error: extraversion and feedback-related negativity
    Smillie, Luke D.
    Cooper, Andrew J.
    Pickering, Alan D.
    SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 6 (05) : 646 - 652
  • [6] Changes in the feedback-related negativity with learning
    Sailer, U.
    Fischmeister, F. Ph. S.
    Bauer, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 69 (03) : 217 - 217
  • [7] The feedback-related negativity (FRN) in adolescents
    Zottoli, Tina M.
    Grose-Fifer, Jillian
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 49 (03) : 413 - 420
  • [8] Individual differences in reward prediction error: contrasting relations between feedback-related negativity and trait measures of reward sensitivity,impulsivity and extraversion
    Cooper, Andrew J.
    Duke, Eilish
    Pickering, Alan D.
    Smillie, Luke D.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [9] Baseline EEG theta/beta ratio and punishment sensitivity as biomarkers for feedback-related negativity (FRN) and risk-taking
    Massar, S. A. A.
    Rossi, V.
    Schutter, D. J. L. G.
    Kenemans, J. L.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 123 (10) : 1958 - 1965
  • [10] Context-sensitivity of the feedback-related negativity for zero-value feedback outcomes
    Pfabigan, Daniela M.
    Seidel, Eva-Maria
    Paul, Katharina
    Grahl, Arvina
    Sailer, Uta
    Lanzenberger, Rupert
    Windischberger, Christian
    Lamm, Claus
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 104 : 184 - 192