From intellectual capital to company's competitiveness

被引:0
作者
Leon, Ramona-Diana [1 ]
机构
[1] Alexandru Ioan Cuza Univ, Dept Management Mkt & Business Adm, Iasi 700505, Romania
来源
IFKAD 2014: 9TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: KNOWLEDGE AND MANAGEMENT MODELS FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH | 2014年
关键词
Intellectual capital; Competitiveness; Human capital; Turnover rate; Stock price; KNOWLEDGE; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; ADVANTAGE; BUSINESS; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Purpose - Researches made in the last 25 years presented knowledge as a dynamic and fluid resource, critical for company's success. Although there are some remarkable attempts of measuring knowledge assets and intellectual capital of a firm, their analysis tend to be static. They are either reflecting the current stage of development or they are highlighting an average performance. Besides, they overlook the fact that company's competitiveness depends on competitors' characteristics and actions. Starting from these, we aim to develop a benchmarking tool capable of capturing company's competitive position and future evolution, based on its efficiency of using intellectual capital. Design/methodology/approach - Developing an exploratory research, we combine the qualitative with the quantitative analysis. We create a composite index, entitled Competitiveness Intellectual Capital Index (CICI), for 20 Romanian companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange (BSE). Our longitudinal study has three phases. First, we establish CICI's value during 2009 - 2012, for each company. Then, we determine the average annual growth rate registered during 2009 - 2012. In the third stage, we develop a strategic knowledge map, using CICI's value and the average annual growth rate. Based on these coordinates, we split the companies in four categories: leaders, chasing stars, followers and traditionalists. Originality/value - This methodology brings forward the relative character of intellectual capital and its long term relationship with company's competitiveness. First of all, it reflects that intellectual capital means more than money; it's about creating, disseminating and using knowledge; it's about valuing company's human resources and its relationships with all the stakeholders. Secondly, it highlights that a company is competitive only when it manages its knowledge assets more efficiently than its competitors. Taking this into account, CICI is the first instrument that evaluates a company's intellectual capital by comparing its performance with the one registered by the direct and indirect competitors. Practical implications - The outcomes of developing and using this instrument focus on strategic issues. First of all, by using CICI, managers can have a complete image on what's happening in the environment in which they operate. Secondly, they can notice where do they stand (compared with their competitors and companies from different fields of activity); they can identify potential threats and opportunities, they can monitor change and they can develop future strategies. In other words, it may serve as a managerial early warning system.
引用
收藏
页码:1075 / 1094
页数:20
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
AMIRI A, 2010, EUROPEAN J SCI RES, V40, P91
[2]  
Anderson R.C., 1998, MIDCOURSE CORRECTION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GLOB COMP REP 2013 2
[4]   Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows [J].
Bontis, N ;
Crossan, MM ;
Hulland, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2002, 39 (04) :437-469
[5]  
Bontis N., 1998, Management Decision, V36, P63, DOI [10.1108/00251749810204142, DOI 10.1108/00251749810204142]
[6]  
Bontis N., 2002, J INTELLECT CAP, V3, P223, DOI DOI 10.1108/14691930210435589
[7]  
Bueno E., 2011, Documentos Intellectus, V9, P1
[8]   Intelectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry [J].
Cabrita, Maria do Rosario ;
Bontis, Nick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2008, 43 (1-3) :212-237
[9]  
Chen J., 2004, Journal of Intellectual Capital, V5, P195, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14691930410513003, 10.1108/14691930410513003]
[10]   PARADIGM FOR DEVELOPING BETTER MEASURES OF MARKETING CONSTRUCTS [J].
CHURCHILL, GA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1979, 16 (01) :64-73