Modified staging classification of gallbladder carcinoma on the basis of the 8th edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system

被引:7
|
作者
Wang, Jie [1 ]
Bo, Xiaobo [1 ]
Shi, Xiao [2 ]
Suo, Tao [1 ]
Xin, Yanlei [1 ]
Nan, Lingxi [1 ]
Wang, Changcheng [1 ]
Ni, Xiaoling [1 ]
Liu, Han [1 ]
Pan, Hongtao [1 ]
Shen, Sheng [1 ]
Li, Min [1 ]
Lu, Pinxiang [3 ]
Zhang, Dexiang [3 ]
Wang, Zhiqin [3 ]
Wang, Yueqi [1 ]
Liu, Houbao [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Zhongshan Xuhui Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
EJSO | 2020年 / 46卷 / 04期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gallbladder cancer; 8th; AJCC; SEER; Staging system; STATISTICS; RESECTION; SURVIVAL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The 8th edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System for gallbladder cancer (GBC) has been used in clinical practice, but we have found some deficiencies in this edition. Methods: Survival analyses were performed to evaluate the application of various editions of the AJCC staging systems using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (N = 9616 patients) and Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital (FUZH) database (N = 327 patients). A modified staging system was proposed based on the 8th edition of the AJCC Staging System. Results: Although all N2 diseases were grouped into stage IVB as M1 in the 8th edition, some patients with N2 diseases could undergo RO resection, and had longer survival than patients with M1 diseases had in both cohorts (p <0.001 in SEER, p = 0.041 in FUZH). Furthermore, in the SEER database, stage IIIA patients aberrantly had poorer survival than stage IIIB patients had (p < 0.001). Therefore, we proposed a modified staging system by rearranging the substages. N2 disease was subdivided and reappraised according to T stage, and the aberrant survival reversal of stage IIIA and stage IIIB disease was also corrected. Through our modification, the C-index of the 8th AJCC Staging System was elevated from 0.596 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.585-0.607] to 0.623 (95% CI 0.612-0.634) for local disease in the SEER cohort. Similar findings were also observed in the FUZH cohort. Conclusion: Our modified 8th AJCC Staging System is more suitable for GBC and could be adopted for clinical practice. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 533
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Eyelid sebaceous gland carcinoma: An assessment of the T classification of the American Joint Committee of Cancer TNM staging system 8th versus 7th edition
    AlHammad, Fatimah
    Edward, Deepak P.
    Alkatan, Hind M.
    El-Khamary, Sahar
    Iuliano, Adriana
    Maktabi, Azza
    Al-Horani, Saif El-Deen
    Al-Sheikh, Osama
    Al Hussain, Hailah
    Strianese, Diego
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 31 (04) : 2055 - 2063
  • [42] The Prognostic Value of the AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
    Kantor, Olga
    Bao, Jean
    Jaskowiak, Nora
    Yao, Katherine
    Tseng, Jennifer
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) : 352 - 358
  • [43] AJCC 8th edition staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A controversial step forward?
    Shi, Si
    Hua, Jie
    Yu, Xian-Jun
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (04): : 703 - 703
  • [44] Impacts of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system on outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer in Thai patients
    Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon
    Chatchomchuan, Waralee
    Karndumri, Krittadhee
    Porramatikul, Sriurai
    Krittiyawong, Sirinate
    Wanothayaroj, Ekgaluck
    Butadej, Siriwan
    Nakasatien, Soontaree
    Veerasomboonsin, Veekij
    Kanchanapituk, Auchai
    Rajatanavin, Rajata
    Himathongkam, Thep
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (03)
  • [45] Analysis of Prognostic Factors from 9387 Merkel Cell Carcinoma Cases Forms the Basis for the New 8th Edition AJCC Staging System
    Harms, Kelly L.
    Healy, Mark A.
    Nghiem, Paul
    Sober, Arthur J.
    Johnson, Timothy M.
    Bichakjian, Christopher K.
    Wong, Sandra L.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (11) : 3564 - 3571
  • [47] Comparison of a Tumor-Ratio-Metastasis Staging System and the 8th AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer
    Zhang, Miaoquan
    Ding, Chao
    Xu, Lin
    Ou, Biyi
    Feng, Shoucheng
    Wang, Guoqiang
    Wang, Wei
    Liang, Yao
    Chen, Yingbo
    Zhou, Zhiwei
    Qiu, Haibo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [48] Comparison of the 7th and 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems for breast cancer patients: a Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis
    Shao, Nan
    Xie, Chuanbo
    Shi, Yawei
    Ye, Runyi
    Long, Jianting
    Shi, Huijuan
    Shan, Zhen
    Thompson, Alastair M.
    Lin, Ying
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 1433 - 1442
  • [49] Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for gastric cancer patients after preoperative therapy
    Ikoma, Naruhiko
    Blum, Mariela
    Estrella, Jeannelyn S.
    Das, Prajnan
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Fournier, Keith F.
    Mansfield, Paul
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    Badgwell, Brian D.
    GASTRIC CANCER, 2018, 21 (01) : 74 - 83
  • [50] Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual 8th Edition for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
    Gaspersz, Marcia P.
    Buettner, Stefan
    van Vugt, Jeroen L. A.
    de Jonge, Jeroen
    Polak, Wojciech G.
    Doukas, Michail
    Ijzermans, Jan N. M.
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    Willemssen, Francois E. J. A.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2020, 24 (07) : 1612 - 1618