Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture

被引:95
|
作者
Roberge, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Chaillet, Nils [3 ]
Boutin, Amelie [1 ,2 ]
Moore, Lynne [2 ,4 ]
Jastrow, Nicole [5 ]
Brassard, Normand [1 ]
Gauthier, Robert J. [3 ]
Hudic, Igor [6 ]
Shipp, Thomas D. [7 ]
Weimar, Charlotte H. E. [8 ]
Fatusic, Zlatan [6 ]
Demers, Suzanne [1 ]
Bujold, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G2, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Fac Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G2, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[4] Ctr Hosp Affilie Univ Quebec, Hop Enfant Jesus, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Geneva, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Hop Univ Geneve, Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Clin Ctr, Clin Gynecol & Obstet, Tuzla, Bosnia & Herceg
[7] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Cesarean delivery; Hysterotomy; Pregnancy; Uterine rupture; Vaginal birth after cesarean; VAGINAL BIRTH; MISGAV-LADACH; 2-LAYER CLOSURE; SECTION; METAANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the best available evidence regarding the association between single-layer closure and uterine rupture. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for relevant observational and experimental studies that included women with a previous single, low, transverse cesarean delivery who had attempted a trial of labor (TOL). The risks of uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence were assessed by pooled odds ratios (OR) calculated with a random effects model. Results: Nine studies including 5810 women were reviewed. Overall, the risk of uterine rupture during TOL after a single-layer closure was not significantly different from that after a double-layer closure (OR 1.71; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 0.66-4.44). However, a sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk of uterine rupture was increased after a locked single-layer closure (OR 4.96; 95% Cl 2.58-9.52, P<0.001) but not after an unlocked single-layer closure (OR 0.49; 95% Cl 0.21-1.16), compared with a double-layer closure. Conclusion: Locked but not unlocked single-layer closures were associated with a higher uterine rupture risk than double-layer closure in women attempting a TOL (C) 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 10
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Rozenberg, P.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05)
  • [42] Cesarean Delivery at Extreme Prematurity: Risk of Uterine Rupture Independent of Incision Type
    Lannon, Sophia R.
    Guthrie, Katherine A.
    Vanderhoeven, Jeroen P.
    Gammill, Hilary S.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2013, 20 (S3) : 104A - 104A
  • [43] Unintended lower-segment hysterotomy extension at cesarean delivery and the risk for uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor
    Peled, Tzuria
    Ashwal, Eran
    Rotem, Reut
    Sela, Hen Y.
    Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina
    Rottenstreich, Misgav
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 162 (03) : 957 - 963
  • [45] Purse-string double-layer closure for cesarean incision (Turan technique): Some concerns
    Matsubara, Shigeki
    Lefor, Alan K.
    Ohkuchi, Akihide
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (05) : 828 - 829
  • [46] Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Demers, Suzanne
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Chaillet, Nils
    Moore, Lynne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (05) : 453 - 460
  • [48] Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial
    Stegwee, S., I
    van der Voet, L. F.
    Ben, A. J.
    de Leeuw, R. A.
    van de Ven, P. M.
    Duijnhoven, R. G.
    Bongers, M. Y.
    Lambalk, C. B.
    de Groot, C. J. M.
    Huirne, J. A. F.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 (05) : 866 - 878
  • [49] Continuous vs interrupted sutures for single-layer closure of uterine incision at cesarean section
    M. Hohlagschwandtner
    K. Chalubinski
    A. Nather
    P. Husslein
    E. Joura
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2003, 268 (1) : 26 - 28
  • [50] Single-layer vs double-layer uterine closure during cesarean delivery: 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (2Close study)
    Verberkt, Carry
    Stegwee, Sanne I.
    Van der Voet, Lucet F.
    Van Baal, W. Marchien
    Kapiteijn, Kitty
    Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
    Van Eekelen, Rik
    de Groot, Christianne J. M.
    de Leeuw, Robert A.
    Huirne, Judith A. F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 231 (03) : 346E1 - 346E11