Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture

被引:95
|
作者
Roberge, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Chaillet, Nils [3 ]
Boutin, Amelie [1 ,2 ]
Moore, Lynne [2 ,4 ]
Jastrow, Nicole [5 ]
Brassard, Normand [1 ]
Gauthier, Robert J. [3 ]
Hudic, Igor [6 ]
Shipp, Thomas D. [7 ]
Weimar, Charlotte H. E. [8 ]
Fatusic, Zlatan [6 ]
Demers, Suzanne [1 ]
Bujold, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G2, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Fac Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G2, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[4] Ctr Hosp Affilie Univ Quebec, Hop Enfant Jesus, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Geneva, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Hop Univ Geneve, Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Clin Ctr, Clin Gynecol & Obstet, Tuzla, Bosnia & Herceg
[7] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Cesarean delivery; Hysterotomy; Pregnancy; Uterine rupture; Vaginal birth after cesarean; VAGINAL BIRTH; MISGAV-LADACH; 2-LAYER CLOSURE; SECTION; METAANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the best available evidence regarding the association between single-layer closure and uterine rupture. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for relevant observational and experimental studies that included women with a previous single, low, transverse cesarean delivery who had attempted a trial of labor (TOL). The risks of uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence were assessed by pooled odds ratios (OR) calculated with a random effects model. Results: Nine studies including 5810 women were reviewed. Overall, the risk of uterine rupture during TOL after a single-layer closure was not significantly different from that after a double-layer closure (OR 1.71; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 0.66-4.44). However, a sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk of uterine rupture was increased after a locked single-layer closure (OR 4.96; 95% Cl 2.58-9.52, P<0.001) but not after an unlocked single-layer closure (OR 0.49; 95% Cl 0.21-1.16), compared with a double-layer closure. Conclusion: Locked but not unlocked single-layer closures were associated with a higher uterine rupture risk than double-layer closure in women attempting a TOL (C) 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 10
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Single- Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Cesarean Section Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Qayum, Kaif
    Kar, Irfan
    Sofi, Junaid
    Panneerselvam, Hari
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [12] The Never Ending Debate Single-Layer Versus Double-Layer Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Section
    C. V. Hegde
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2014, 64 (4) : 239 - 240
  • [13] The Never Ending Debate Single-Layer Versus Double-Layer Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Section
    Hegde, C. V.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2014, 64 (04): : 239 - 240
  • [14] EARLY HISTOPATHOLOGICAL COMPARISON OF SINGLE VERSUS DOUBLE-LAYER CLOSURE OF UTERINE INCISION DURING CESAREAN: A CONTROLLED STUDY IN RATS
    Civelek, Merve
    Buyukkurt, Selim
    Yilmaz, Mehmet Bertan
    Erdogan, Kivilcim Eren
    Oksuz, Hale
    Avci, Cagri
    Seydaoglu, Gulsah
    JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE-ISTANBUL TIP FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2023, 86 (03): : 220 - 226
  • [15] Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure
    Huirne, J. A. F.
    Stegwee, S. I.
    van der Voet, L. F.
    de Groot, C. J. M.
    Hehenkamp, W. J. K.
    Brolmann, H. A. M.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05) : 664 - +
  • [16] Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery
    Durnwald, C
    Mercer, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) : 925 - 929
  • [17] Single- or double-layer uterine closure techniques following cesarean: A randomized trial
    Yilmaz Baran, Safak
    Kalayci, Hakan
    Dogan Durdag, Gulsen
    Yetkinel, Selcuk
    Alemdaroglu, Songul
    cok, Tayfun
    Bulgan Kilicdag, Esra
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (03) : 531 - 537
  • [18] Letter to the Editor: Single-vs. Double-Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery
    Demers, Suzanne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    Roberge, Stephanie
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2017, 38 (04): : 448 - +
  • [19] The risk of uterine rupture is not increased with single- compared with double-layer closure: a Swedish cohort study
    Hesselman, S.
    Hogberg, U.
    Ekholm-Selling, K.
    Rassjo, E-B
    Jonsson, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (11) : 1535 - 1541
  • [20] Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure Reply
    Saccone, G.
    Sardo, A. Di Spiezio
    Berghella, V.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05) : 666 - +