Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent

被引:42
作者
Hens, Kristien [1 ]
Cassiman, Jean-Jacques [2 ]
Nys, Herman [1 ]
Dierickx, Kris [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth, Ctr Biomed Eth & Law, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Human Genet, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
research ethics; consent; minors; children; biobank; GENETIC RESEARCH; MINORS;
D O I
10.1038/ejhg.2011.29
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The use of stored tissue samples from children for genetic research raises specific ethical questions that are not all analogous to those raised when adult participants are concerned. These include issues with regard to consent, as it is typically a parent who consents to the use of samples from children. In this paper, we discuss the scope of parental consent. This scope has a temporal dimension and one related to the content of consent. It is not questioned that the temporal scope of parental consent is limited and that young adults have the right to decide on the fate of their samples when they reach the age of maturity. With regard to the content of consent, the question remains whether parents are allowed to give full broad consent to any possible future research on the samples of their children. We argue that they should not be allowed to do so, based on two premises. First, it is generally acknowledged that children have a right to express their own values and that they should be given the opportunity to develop their own autonomy as they grow older. Second, research and science are not completely value-free and some types of research may be more sensitive than other types. Children should be given the opportunity to express their values also in this respect. European Journal of Human Genetics (2011) 19, 735-739; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2011.29; published online 9 March 2011
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 739
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Genetic testing of children for familial cancers: a comparative legal perspective on consent, communication of information and confidentiality
    Gilbar, Roy
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2010, 9 (01) : 75 - 87
  • [32] Alternative consent models for biobanks: The new Spanish law on biomedical research
    Casado Da Rocha, Antonio
    Antonio Seoane, Jose
    BIOETHICS, 2008, 22 (08) : 440 - 447
  • [33] Parental consent in adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome studies
    Smith, Douglas C.
    Boel-Studt, Shamra
    Cleeland, Leah
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2009, 37 (03) : 298 - 306
  • [34] Parental Notification/Consent for Treatment of the Adolescent
    de Miranda, Federico C.
    ISSUES IN LAW & MEDICINE, 2015, 30 (01) : 99 - 105
  • [35] Consent and Research Governance in Biobanks: Evidence from Focus Groups with Medical Researchers
    Whitley, E. A.
    Kanellopoulou, N.
    Kaye, J.
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2012, 15 (05) : 232 - 242
  • [36] Defining the scope of implied consent in the emergency department
    Easton, Raul B.
    Graber, Mark A.
    Mormahan, Jay
    Hughes, Jason
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2007, 7 (12) : 35 - 38
  • [37] When Children Become Adults: Should Biobanks Re-Contact?
    Giesbertz, Noor A. A.
    Bredenoord, Annelien L.
    van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (02):
  • [38] Comparison of underlying factors behind parental refusal or consent for lumbar puncture
    Narchi, Hassib
    Ghatasheh, Ghassan
    Al Hassani, Noura
    Al Reyami, Layla
    Khan, Qudsiya
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2013, 9 (04) : 336 - 341
  • [39] THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION: A THREAT TO VALID PARENTAL CONSENT FOR PEDIATRIC NEUROIMAGING RESEARCH
    Hadskis, Michael
    Kenny, Nuala
    Downie, Jocelyn
    Schmidt, Matthias
    D'Arcy, Ryan
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2008, 15 (03): : 133 - 151
  • [40] The quality of parental consent for research with children: A prospective repeated measure self-report survey
    Franck, Linda S.
    Winter, Ira
    Oulton, Kate
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2007, 44 (04) : 525 - 533