E-Cigarette-Related Nicotine Misinformation on Social Media

被引:15
作者
Sidani, Jaime E. [1 ]
Hoffman, Beth L. [1 ]
Colditz, Jason B. [2 ]
Melcher, Eleanna [3 ]
Taneja, Sanya Bathla [4 ]
Shensa, Ariel [5 ]
Primack, Brian [6 ]
Davis, Esa [2 ]
Chu, Kar-Hai [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Gen Internal Med, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Med Scientist Training Program, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Intelligent Syst Program, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Arkansas, Coll Educ & Hlth Profess, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Twitter; electronic cigarettes; nicotine; misinformation; social media; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/10826084.2022.2026963
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Twitter provides an opportunity to examine misperceptions about nicotine and addiction as they pertain to electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The purpose of this study was to systematically examine a sample of ENDS-related tweets that presented information about nicotine or addiction for the presence of potential misinformation. Methods. A total of 10.1 million ENDS-related tweets were obtained from April 2018 through March 2019 and were filtered for unique tweets containing keywords for nicotine and addiction. A subsample (n = 3,116) were human coded for type of account (individual, group, commercial, or news) and presence of potential misinformation. Results. Of tweets that presented ENDS-related nicotine or addiction information (n = 904), 41.7% (n = 377) contained potential misinformation coded as anti-vaping exaggeration, pro-vaping exaggeration, nicotine is not addictive or is never harmful, or unproven health benefits. Conclusions. Anti-vaping exaggeration tweets distorted or embellished claims about ENDS nicotine and addiction; pro-vaping exaggeration tweets misinterpreted results from scientific studies. Misinformation that nicotine is not addictive or is never harmful or has unproven health benefits appeared less but are potentially problematic. ENDS-related messaging should be designed to be easily understood by the public and monitored to detect the spread of misinterpretation or misinformation on social media.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 594
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Longitudinal associations of tobacco-related social media involvement with cigarette and e-cigarette initiation among US adolescents
    Lingpeng Shan
    Sunday Azagba
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2022, 181 : 189 - 196
  • [42] Understanding the intent behind sharing misinformation on social media
    Agarwal, Basant
    Agarwal, Ajay
    Harjule, Priyanka
    Rahman, Azizur
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & THEORETICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 35 (04) : 573 - 587
  • [43] What to Believe? Social Media Commentary and Belief in Misinformation
    Nicolas M. Anspach
    Taylor N. Carlson
    Political Behavior, 2020, 42 : 697 - 718
  • [44] The miasma of misinformation: a social analysis of media, markets, and manipulation
    Dholakia, Nikhilesh
    Ozgun, Aras
    Atik, Deniz
    CONSUMPTION MARKETS & CULTURE, 2023, 26 (03) : 217 - 232
  • [45] Going Viral: Sharing of Misinformation by Social Media Influencers
    Mulcahy, Rory
    Barnes, Renee
    Scheepers, Retha de Villiers
    Kay, Samantha
    List, Eleanor
    AUSTRALASIAN MARKETING JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [46] Leveraging transfer learning for detecting misinformation on social media
    Reshi J.A.
    Ali R.
    International Journal of Information Technology, 2024, 16 (2) : 949 - 955
  • [47] Social media trust: Fighting misinformation in the time of crisis
    Shahbazi, Maryam
    Bunker, Deborah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 77
  • [48] Fighting Misinformation on Social Media: YouTube Cancer Videos
    Musmar, Abdallah
    Zhang, He
    Mithas, Sunil
    Padmanabhan, Balaji
    DIGITAL INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (AMCIS 2021), 2021,
  • [49] What to Believe? Social Media Commentary and Belief in Misinformation
    Anspach, Nicolas M.
    Carlson, Taylor N.
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 42 (03) : 697 - 718
  • [50] Support for misinformation regulation on social media: It is the perceived harm of misinformation that matters, not the perceived amount
    Freiling, Isabelle
    Stubenvoll, Marlis
    Matthes, Joerg
    POLICY AND INTERNET, 2023, 15 (04): : 731 - 749