Detection of Pancreatic Carcinoma and Liver Metastases with Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison with Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT

被引:144
作者
Motosugi, Utaroh [1 ]
Ichikawa, Tomoaki [1 ]
Morisaka, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Sou, Hironobu [1 ]
Muhi, Ali [1 ]
Kimura, Kazufumi [1 ]
Sano, Katsuhiro [1 ]
Araki, Tsutomu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Yamanashi, Dept Radiol, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan
关键词
GD-EOB-DTPA; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; HELICAL CT; DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; MDCT; PATIENT; LESIONS; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.11103548
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To intraindividually compare gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with contrast material-enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in detection of pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastases. Materials and Methods: The ethics committee approved this retrospective study with waiver of informed consent. This study included 100 patients (53 men, 47 women; mean age, 67.8 years) consisting of 54 patients with pathologically confirmed pancreatic carcinoma (mean size, 33 mm) and 46 without a pancreatic lesion. Sixty-two liver metastases (mean size, 10 mm) in 15 patients with pancreatic carcinoma were diagnosed at pathologic examination or multimodality assessment. Three readers blinded to the final diagnosis interpreted all MR (precontrast T1- and T2-weighted and gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic and hepatocyte phase MR images) and tetraphasic dynamic contrast-enhanced CT images and graded the presence (or absence) of pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastasis on patient-by-patient and lesion-by-lesion bases. Receiver operating characteristic analysis, McNemar test, and Fisher test were performed to compare the diagnostic performance of CT and MR imaging. Results: No significant differences were observed between CT and MR images in depiction of pancreatic carcinoma. However, MR imaging had greater sensitivity in depicting liver metastasis than did CT for two of the three readers in the MR imaging-versus-CT analysis (85% vs 69%, P = .046) and for all three readers in the lesion-by-lesion analysis (92%-94% vs 74%-76%, P = .030-.044). Conclusion: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging was equivalent to dynamic contrast-enhanced CT in depicting pancreatic carcinoma and had better sensitivity for depicting liver metastases, suggesting the usefulness of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for evaluation of patients with pancreatic carcinoma. (C) RSNA, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 453
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Clinical value of MRI liver-specific contrast agents: a tailored examination for a confident non-invasive diagnosis of focal liver lesions
    Ba-Ssalamah, Ahmed
    Uffmann, Martin
    Saini, Sanjai
    Bastati, Nina
    Herold, Christian
    Schima, Wolfgang
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (02) : 342 - 357
  • [2] Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis - Meta-analysis
    Bipat, S
    van Leeuwen, MS
    Comans, EFI
    Pijl, MEJ
    Bossuyt, PMM
    Zwinderman, AH
    Stoker, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (01) : 123 - 131
  • [3] COMPARISON OF GD-EOB-DTPA AND GD-DTPA FOR CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING OF LIVER-TUMORS
    CLEMENT, O
    MUHLER, A
    VEXLER, VS
    KUWATSURU, R
    BERTHEZENE, Y
    ROSENAU, W
    BRASCH, RC
    [J]. JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1993, 3 (01): : 71 - 77
  • [4] Intraindividual Comparison of Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MR Imaging and 64-Section Multidetector CT in the Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Cirrhosis
    Di Martino, Michele
    Marin, Daniele
    Guerrisi, Antonino
    Baski, Mahbubeh
    Galati, Francesca
    Rossi, Massimo
    Brozzetti, Stefania
    Masciangelo, Raffaele
    Passariello, Roberto
    Catalano, Carlo
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2010, 256 (03) : 806 - 816
  • [5] Analysis of clustered matched-pair data
    Durkalski, VL
    Palesch, YY
    Lipsitz, SR
    Rust, PF
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (15) : 2417 - 2428
  • [6] Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: MDCT versus MRI in the detection and assessment of locoregional extension
    Erturk, Sukru Mehmet
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Sou, Hironobu
    Saitou, Ryo
    Tsukamoto, Tatsuaki
    Motosugi, Utarou
    Araki, Tsutomu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2006, 30 (04) : 583 - 590
  • [7] Statistical issues in analysis of diagnostic imaging experiments with multiple observations per patient
    Gönen, M
    Panageas, KS
    Larson, SM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 (03) : 763 - 767
  • [8] Islet cell tumor of the pancreas: Biphasic CT versus MR imaging in tumor detection
    Ichikawa, T
    Peterson, MS
    Federle, MP
    Baron, RL
    Haradome, H
    Kawamori, Y
    Nawano, S
    Araki, T
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (01) : 163 - 171
  • [9] Detection and Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions A Japanese Phase III, Multicenter Comparison Between Gadoxetic Acid Disodium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Predominantly in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Chronic Liver Disease
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Saito, Kazuhiro
    Yoshioka, Naoki
    Tanimoto, Akihiro
    Gokan, Takehiko
    Takehara, Yasuo
    Kamura, Takeshi
    Gabata, Toshifumi
    Murakami, Takamichi
    Ito, Katsuyoshi
    Hirohashi, Shinji
    Nishie, Akihiro
    Saito, Yoko
    Onaya, Hiroaki
    Kuwatsuru, Ryohei
    Morimoto, Atsuko
    Ueda, Koji
    Kurauchi, Masayo
    Breuer, Josy
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2010, 45 (03) : 133 - 141
  • [10] Hepatic hemangioma: Atypical appearances on CT, MR imaging, and sonography
    Jang, HJ
    Kim, TK
    Lim, HK
    Park, SJ
    Sim, JS
    Kim, HY
    Lee, JH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 180 (01) : 135 - 141