In vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftazidime-avibactam, and comparators against Gram-positive and -negative organisms in China: the 2018 results from the ATLAS program

被引:5
作者
Jia, Peiyao [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hui [1 ]
Cheng, Bin [3 ]
Guo, Ping [4 ]
Xu, Yingchun [1 ]
Yang, Qiwen [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Clin Lab, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, State Key Lab Complex Severe & Rare Dis, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Grad Sch, Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Miyun Teaching Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Pfizer Investment Co Ltd, Med Affairs Dept, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ceftaroline; Ceftazidime-avibactam; Antibiotic susceptibility; Gram-negative; Gram-positive; China; SKIN-STRUCTURE INFECTIONS; US MEDICAL-CENTERS; RESISTANT KLEBSIELLA-PNEUMONIAE; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; BACTERIAL-RESISTANCE; SOFT-TISSUE; PATHOGENS; SURVEILLANCE; FOSAMIL; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12866-022-02644-5
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background Data on antibiotic resistance is essential to adapt treatment strategies against the rapidly changing reality of antimicrobial resistance. Objective To study the in vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftazidime-avibactam, and comparators against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria collected from China in the year 2018. Methods A total of 2301 clinical isolates were collected from 17 medical center laboratories in China, which participated in the ATLAS program in 2018. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined by the broth microdilution method at a central laboratory. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints were used to interpret the results except for tigecycline, for which the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) breakpoint were used. Results The susceptibility rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP), and beta-hemolytic streptococcus to ceftaroline were 83.9%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Escherichia coli, imipenem-susceptible (IMP-S) Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, IMP-S Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis, Morganella morganii, Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa had high susceptibility rates to ceftazidime-avibactam (95.8%, 100%, 97.7%, 94.5%, 100%, 90.2%, 96.0%, 97.5% and 90.7%, respectively). However, imipenem-resistant Escherichia coli and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrated low susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam (33.3% and 75.8%, respectively). Against MRSA, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), S. pneumoniae and beta-hemolytic streptococci, the susceptibility rates of tigecycline were 93.5%, 99.2%, 100% and 100%, respectively. Levofloxacin also showed high in vitro activity against S. pneumoniae and beta-hemolytic streptococci with a susceptibility rate of 100% and 98.4%. The susceptibility rate of E. faecalis to ampicillin was 100%. Among Gram-negative isolates, tigecycline and colistin showed good activity against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, imipenem-resistant E. cloacae, C. freundii and A. baumannii (susceptibility rates and intermediate susceptibility rates of 99.3% and 96.8%, 95.4% and 94.5%, 100% and 87.5%, 96.4% and 89.3%, MIC90 of 2 mg/L and 97.4%, respectively). E. coli and E. cloacae had high susceptibility rates to imipenem and meropenem (93.0% and 92.8%, 89.8% and 92.1%, respectively). M. morganii and P. mirabilis demonstrated meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam susceptibility rates of 96.0% and 94.0%, 94.1% and 92.2%, respectively. Conclusion Ceftaroline showed good activity among tested antimicrobial agents against Gram-positive species, while ceftazidime-avibactam had good activity against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis, Morganella morganii, Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa excluding carbapenem-resistant isolates.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Global antimicrobial resistance surveillance system (GLASS) report: Early implementation 2017-2018
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ANT RES THREATS US
[3]   Activity of ceftaroline against pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia collected as part of the AWARE surveillance program, 2015-2016 [J].
Bae, In-Gyu ;
Stone, Gregory G. .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 95 (03)
[4]  
Bui T., 2021, StatPearls
[5]   Ceftaroline Fosamil for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: from FOCUS to CAPTURE [J].
Carreno J.J. ;
Lodise T.P. .
Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 2014, 3 (2) :123-132
[6]   Targeting Antibiotic Resistance [J].
Chellat, Mathieu F. ;
Raguz, Luka ;
Riedl, Rainer .
ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2016, 55 (23) :6600-6626
[7]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 2021, M100S31 CLSI
[8]   Newer Intravenous Antibiotics in the Intensive Care Unit: Ceftaroline, Ceftolozane-Tazobactam, and Ceftazidime-Avibactam [J].
Connor, Kathryn A. .
AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 27 (04) :353-357
[9]   Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftaroline and Other Anti-Infective Agents against Microbial Pathogens Recovered from the Surgical Intensive Care Patient Population: A Prevalence Analysis [J].
Edmiston, Charles E., Jr. ;
Krepel, Candace J. ;
Leaper, David ;
Ledeboer, Nathan A. ;
Mackey, Tami-Lea ;
Graham, Mary Beth ;
Lee, Cheong ;
Rossi, Peter J. ;
Brown, Kellie R. ;
Lewis, Brian D. ;
Seabrook, Gary R. .
SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2014, 15 (06) :745-751
[10]   Ceftaroline fosamil for community-acquired pneumonia and skin and skin structure infections: a systematic review [J].
El Hajj, Maguy Saffouh ;
Turgeon, Ricky D. ;
Wilby, Kyle John .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2017, 39 (01) :26-32