Quality of life outcome in revision rhinoplasty in regards to number of revision surgeries and cartilage donor site

被引:2
作者
Riedel, Frank [1 ]
Waehmann, Matthias [1 ]
Veit, Johannes A. [1 ,2 ]
Bulut, Olcay Cem [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] HNO Zent Rhein Neckar, Stresemannstr 22, D-68165 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Mannheim, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Klinikum Gesundbrunnen, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Heilbronn, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Rhinoplasty; Quality of life; Revision rhinoplasty; Cartilage; Ear cartilage; Septal cartilage; PROM;
D O I
10.1016/j.anl.2021.08.004
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: Rhinoplasty with or without combined septoplasty is one of the most frequently performed procedures in facial plastic surgery. Patient satisfaction and improvement in quality of life (QoL) is the primary goal. This prospective study was conducted to analyse Qol outcome in revision rhinoplasty in regards to number of revision surgeries and cartilage donor site using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).Methods: Preoperative and at least 12-months postoperative scores on the Nasal Obstruction Symptome Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire (range 0-100, lower scores indicate better outcome) and the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire (range 0-100, higher scores indicates better outcome) were obtained. Additionally, data on age, gender and number of previous rhinoplasties were assessed. All revision rhinoplasties were performed by one surgeon (author, F.R.) between 2014 and 2017.Results: Sixty-four patients (11 (17.2%) male, 53 (82.8%) female) prospectively enrolled in this study. In 41 (64.1%) cases septal cartilage and in 23 (35.9%) patients ear cartilage was the donor site in revision surgery. Patients with more than one previous surgery (n = 18) started with a lower preoperative ROE score (28.2 +/- 12.8) compared to patients who had received only one previous surgery. The difference however was not significant (p = 0.06). This subgroup still showed significant postoperative improvement (ROE-postop 61.9 +/- 24.2; p < 0.05). Both cohorts (septal cartilage and ear cartilage) improved significantly in regards to their ROE and NOSE scores after surgery and therefore showed improved health-related QoL. We could not detect any differences in health-related QoL postoperatively in regards to cartilage donor site in revision surgery.Conclusion: Revision rhinoplasty improves health-related QoL. There are no differences in ROEor NOSE-scores postoperatively in regards to graft material (ear- versus septal cartilage). Both subgroups show significantly higher scores postoperatively. (c) 2021 Japanese Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Inc. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 290
页数:5
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Alsarraf R, 2001, Arch Facial Plast Surg, V3, P198, DOI 10.1001/archfaci.3.3.198
  • [2] Quality of life in functional rhinoplasty: rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation German version (ROE-D)
    Bulut, Olcay Cem
    Plinkert, Peter K.
    Wallner, Frank
    Baumann, Ingo
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 273 (09) : 2569 - 2573
  • [3] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Scales for Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Cano, Stefan J.
    East, Charles A.
    Baker, Stephen B.
    Badia, Lydia
    Schwitzer, Jonathan A.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    [J]. JAMA FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 18 (01) : 27 - 35