Impact of a cattle brush on feedlot steer behavior, productivity and stress physiology

被引:24
作者
Park, Rachel M. [1 ]
Schubach, Kelsey M. [1 ]
Cooke, Reinaldo F. [1 ]
Herring, Andy D. [1 ]
Jennings, Jenny S. [2 ]
Daigle, Courtney L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Anim Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M AgriLife Res & Extens Serv, Amarillo, TX USA
关键词
Environmental enrichment; Cattle brush; Behavior; Feedlot; Aggression; Stereotypies; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; STEREOTYPIC BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; CORTISOL; CALVES; LEVEL; HAIR; PIGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104995
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of environmental enrichment (EE), in the form of a cattle brush, on feedlot cattle behavior, productivity and stress physiology. Steers were blocked by weight and assigned to one of two treatments 1) Cattle brush secured to fence line (BRUSH; n = 3 pens; 25 animals) or 2) No enrichment (CON; n = 3 pens; 26 animals). Video recordings were decoded from 0800 to 1730 on d -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 relative to brush implementation. Headbutting, kicking, mounting, bar licking, tongue rolling, allogrooming and brush usage were scored through continuous observation. Scan samples at 10-minute intervals were utilized to score lying, drinking and eating. Rumination and activity data were collected from rumination collars. Hair coat shed scores were recorded upon feedlot arrival (d -55) and prior to first block slaughter shipment (d 161). Body weights and hair samples for cortisol extraction were obtained at 35 d intervals. Performance measures were calculated weekly and carcass data were collected at slaughter. Impact of day, treatment, and their interaction on cattle behavior and physiological measures and the impact of treatment on performance measures was evaluated in SAS. Cattle housed in BRUSH pens performed fewer headbutts (P = 0.013) over time compared to CON cattle. For BRUSH cattle, frequency and duration of brush usage changed over time, peaking on d 0 (P<0.01). Environmental enrichment treatment impacted mounting, bar licking, tongue rolling, allogrooming and activity levels (P<0.05). Cattle housed in BRUSH pens engaged in fewer mounts, bar licking bouts, tongue rolling bouts and allogrooming bouts and performed all behaviors for a shorter duration of time compared to CON cattle. Research day impacted mounting, bar licking, tongue rolling, allogrooming, activity and rumination (P<0.05). Mounting frequency, bar licking frequency, bar licking duration, activity duration and rumination duration decreased over time while frequency and duration of tongue rolling and allogrooming increased over time. A smaller proportion of steers were observed lying on d 0 and d 4 (P = 0.001) and the proportion of steers feeding decreased over time (P = 0.04). Cattle assigned to BRUSH pens performed fewer stereotypic and aggressive behaviors and cattle did not habituate to the brush suggesting that a cattle brush could provide a lasting benefit to feedlot cattle.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of yeast culture combined with sodium monensin on the productivity and health of feedlot cattle
    Venancio, Luisa da Costa
    de Oliveira, Paulo Eduardo Piemontez
    de Campos, Giuliano Pavani
    Figueiredo, Adriana Nogueira
    Manzano, Ricardo Pereira
    Baldissera, Ellen
    Pinto, Dayana Rochinski da Silveira
    Neumann, Mikael
    [J]. SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2025, 46 (01): : 329 - 350
  • [32] Stocking density in intensive housing and the implications for beef cattle behavior, stress physiology, and liveweight
    Mayes, Bonnie T.
    Dundon, Sharon G.
    Cowley, Frances C.
    Norman, Lee-Emma K.
    Morton, John M.
    Tait, L. Amy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2025, 103
  • [33] Associations between immune competence phenotype and feedlot health and productivity in Angus cattle
    Hine, Brad C.
    Bell, Amy M.
    Niemeyer, Dominic D. O.
    Duff, Christian J.
    Butcher, Nick M.
    Dominik, Sonja
    Porto-Neto, Laercio R.
    Li, Yutao
    Reverter, Antonio
    Ingham, Aaron B.
    Colditz, Ian G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 (02)
  • [34] Welfare assessments of low stress handling in finishing feedlot cattle
    Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 132 - 132
  • [35] Adapting to the new normal: Feedlot cattle circadian rhythm and behavior-based management
    Meneses, Xandra Christine A.
    Park, Rachel M.
    Ridge, Emily
    Daigle, Courtney L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 : 313 - 313
  • [36] Addition of propolis or monensin in the diet: Behavior and productivity of lambs in feedlot
    Itavo, C. C. B. F.
    Morais, M. G.
    Costa, C.
    Itavo, L. C. V.
    Franco, G. L.
    da Silva, J. A.
    Reis, F. A.
    [J]. ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 165 (3-4) : 161 - 166
  • [37] The effects of transport stress on tiger physiology and behavior
    Dembiec, DP
    Snider, RJ
    Zanella, AJ
    [J]. ZOO BIOLOGY, 2004, 23 (04) : 335 - 346
  • [38] Feeding impact of feedlot finished beef cattle: mean and marginals
    Oliveira, Lorena Martins
    dos Santos, Rowberta Teixeira
    Rodrigues, Matheus Silva
    Santana, Marcelo Medeiros
    Wander, Alcido Elenor
    de Carvalho, Eduardo Rodrigues
    [J]. CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2021, 17 : 28 - 54
  • [39] Shade effects on performance, carcass traits, physiology, and behavior of heat-stressed feedlot heifers
    Mitlöhner, FM
    Galyean, ML
    McGlone, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 80 (08) : 2043 - 2050
  • [40] Evaluating the Utility of Individual Cattle Brush Use Behavior as a Novel Behavioral Phenotype Regarding Productivity, Temperament, and Feeding Behavior of Bos Indicus Steers and Heifers Housed in Dry Lots.
    Lozada, Claudia C.
    Daigle, Courtney L.
    O'Reilly, Keara
    Carstens, Gordon
    Riley, David G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 100 : 18 - 18