Impact of a cattle brush on feedlot steer behavior, productivity and stress physiology

被引:24
作者
Park, Rachel M. [1 ]
Schubach, Kelsey M. [1 ]
Cooke, Reinaldo F. [1 ]
Herring, Andy D. [1 ]
Jennings, Jenny S. [2 ]
Daigle, Courtney L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Anim Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M AgriLife Res & Extens Serv, Amarillo, TX USA
关键词
Environmental enrichment; Cattle brush; Behavior; Feedlot; Aggression; Stereotypies; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; STEREOTYPIC BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; CORTISOL; CALVES; LEVEL; HAIR; PIGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104995
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of environmental enrichment (EE), in the form of a cattle brush, on feedlot cattle behavior, productivity and stress physiology. Steers were blocked by weight and assigned to one of two treatments 1) Cattle brush secured to fence line (BRUSH; n = 3 pens; 25 animals) or 2) No enrichment (CON; n = 3 pens; 26 animals). Video recordings were decoded from 0800 to 1730 on d -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 relative to brush implementation. Headbutting, kicking, mounting, bar licking, tongue rolling, allogrooming and brush usage were scored through continuous observation. Scan samples at 10-minute intervals were utilized to score lying, drinking and eating. Rumination and activity data were collected from rumination collars. Hair coat shed scores were recorded upon feedlot arrival (d -55) and prior to first block slaughter shipment (d 161). Body weights and hair samples for cortisol extraction were obtained at 35 d intervals. Performance measures were calculated weekly and carcass data were collected at slaughter. Impact of day, treatment, and their interaction on cattle behavior and physiological measures and the impact of treatment on performance measures was evaluated in SAS. Cattle housed in BRUSH pens performed fewer headbutts (P = 0.013) over time compared to CON cattle. For BRUSH cattle, frequency and duration of brush usage changed over time, peaking on d 0 (P<0.01). Environmental enrichment treatment impacted mounting, bar licking, tongue rolling, allogrooming and activity levels (P<0.05). Cattle housed in BRUSH pens engaged in fewer mounts, bar licking bouts, tongue rolling bouts and allogrooming bouts and performed all behaviors for a shorter duration of time compared to CON cattle. Research day impacted mounting, bar licking, tongue rolling, allogrooming, activity and rumination (P<0.05). Mounting frequency, bar licking frequency, bar licking duration, activity duration and rumination duration decreased over time while frequency and duration of tongue rolling and allogrooming increased over time. A smaller proportion of steers were observed lying on d 0 and d 4 (P = 0.001) and the proportion of steers feeding decreased over time (P = 0.04). Cattle assigned to BRUSH pens performed fewer stereotypic and aggressive behaviors and cattle did not habituate to the brush suggesting that a cattle brush could provide a lasting benefit to feedlot cattle.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Economic impact of an outbreak of botulism in a cattle feedlot
    Soares, Marcelo Cezar
    Gaspar, Alberto O.
    Brumatti, Ricardo C.
    Gomes, Danilo C.
    Neves, Daniela A.
    Alcantara, Lilian O. B.
    Leal, Paula V.
    Lemos, Ricardo A. A.
    PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA, 2018, 38 (07): : 1365 - 1370
  • [22] Impact of digital dermatitis on feedlot cattle behaviour
    Thomas, Anice D.
    Orsel, Karin
    Cortes, Julian A.
    Pajor, Edmond A.
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2021, 244
  • [23] Effects of different forage levels on performance and feeding behavior of feedlot cattle
    Souza, Mailza G.
    Canedo Mendonca, Filipe Araujo
    Azevedo Ventorin, Joao Pedro
    Zulim, Guilherme Ortega
    Afonso, Rafael Rodrigues
    Prandini, Vitor Tenan
    Marinho, Benjamim Clemente
    Lanna, Dante Pazzanese
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 769 - 769
  • [24] Impact of ivermectin-resistant gastrointestinal nematodes in feedlot cattle in Argentina
    Fazzio, Luis E.
    Yacachury, Nicolas
    Galvan, Walter R.
    Peruzzo, Elias
    Sanchez, Ricardo O.
    Gimeno, Eduardo J.
    PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA, 2012, 32 (05): : 419 - 423
  • [25] Impact of social stress during gestation and environmental enrichment during lactation on the maternal behavior of sows
    Ringgenberg, Nadine
    Bergeron, Renee
    Meunier-Salauen, Marie-Christine
    Devillers, Nicolas
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2012, 136 (2-4) : 126 - 135
  • [26] Acclimating feedlot cattle: Effects on home pen behavior
    Parsons, R.
    Dewell, G.
    Dewell, R.
    Coetzee, J.
    Noffsinger, T.
    Johnson, A.
    Millman, S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 : 14 - 15
  • [27] Impact of virtual fence technology on yearling steer behavior and performance
    Moreno, R. Velasquez
    Brennan, Jameson R.
    Vandermark, Logan R.
    Ehlert, Krista
    Husmann, Aletta L.
    Dotts, Hadley
    Olson, Kenneth
    Blair, Amanda
    Wang, Tong
    Leffler, Joshua
    Wafula, Walter
    Parsons, Ira L.
    Smith, Zachary K.
    Menendez, Hector M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 3 - 3
  • [28] Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle
    Mader, TL
    Davis, MS
    Brown-Brandl, T
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 (03) : 712 - 719
  • [29] Effects of tail docking on behavior of confined feedlot cattle
    Kroll, L. K.
    Grooms, D. L.
    Siegford, J. M.
    Schweihofer, J. P.
    Daigle, C. L.
    Metz, K.
    Ladoni, M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 92 (10) : 4701 - 4710
  • [30] Comparison of steer behavior when housed in a deep-bedded hoop barn versus an open feedlot with shelter
    Johnson, A. K.
    Lonergan, S. M.
    Busby, W. D.
    Shouse, S. C.
    Maxwell, D. L.
    Harmon, J. D.
    Honeyman, M. S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (06) : 1893 - 1898