Impact of a cattle brush on feedlot steer behavior, productivity and stress physiology

被引:24
|
作者
Park, Rachel M. [1 ]
Schubach, Kelsey M. [1 ]
Cooke, Reinaldo F. [1 ]
Herring, Andy D. [1 ]
Jennings, Jenny S. [2 ]
Daigle, Courtney L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Anim Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M AgriLife Res & Extens Serv, Amarillo, TX USA
关键词
Environmental enrichment; Cattle brush; Behavior; Feedlot; Aggression; Stereotypies; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; STEREOTYPIC BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; CORTISOL; CALVES; LEVEL; HAIR; PIGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104995
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of environmental enrichment (EE), in the form of a cattle brush, on feedlot cattle behavior, productivity and stress physiology. Steers were blocked by weight and assigned to one of two treatments 1) Cattle brush secured to fence line (BRUSH; n = 3 pens; 25 animals) or 2) No enrichment (CON; n = 3 pens; 26 animals). Video recordings were decoded from 0800 to 1730 on d -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 relative to brush implementation. Headbutting, kicking, mounting, bar licking, tongue rolling, allogrooming and brush usage were scored through continuous observation. Scan samples at 10-minute intervals were utilized to score lying, drinking and eating. Rumination and activity data were collected from rumination collars. Hair coat shed scores were recorded upon feedlot arrival (d -55) and prior to first block slaughter shipment (d 161). Body weights and hair samples for cortisol extraction were obtained at 35 d intervals. Performance measures were calculated weekly and carcass data were collected at slaughter. Impact of day, treatment, and their interaction on cattle behavior and physiological measures and the impact of treatment on performance measures was evaluated in SAS. Cattle housed in BRUSH pens performed fewer headbutts (P = 0.013) over time compared to CON cattle. For BRUSH cattle, frequency and duration of brush usage changed over time, peaking on d 0 (P<0.01). Environmental enrichment treatment impacted mounting, bar licking, tongue rolling, allogrooming and activity levels (P<0.05). Cattle housed in BRUSH pens engaged in fewer mounts, bar licking bouts, tongue rolling bouts and allogrooming bouts and performed all behaviors for a shorter duration of time compared to CON cattle. Research day impacted mounting, bar licking, tongue rolling, allogrooming, activity and rumination (P<0.05). Mounting frequency, bar licking frequency, bar licking duration, activity duration and rumination duration decreased over time while frequency and duration of tongue rolling and allogrooming increased over time. A smaller proportion of steers were observed lying on d 0 and d 4 (P = 0.001) and the proportion of steers feeding decreased over time (P = 0.04). Cattle assigned to BRUSH pens performed fewer stereotypic and aggressive behaviors and cattle did not habituate to the brush suggesting that a cattle brush could provide a lasting benefit to feedlot cattle.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of environmental enrichment on feedlot steer productivity and aggression
    Park, Rachel M.
    Jennings, Jenny S.
    Daigle, Courtney L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 97 : 226 - 226
  • [2] Hourly activity patterns and behaviour-based management of feedlot steers with and without a cattle brush
    Meneses, Xandra Christine A.
    Park, Rachel M.
    Ridge, Emily E.
    Daigle, Courtney L.
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2021, 236
  • [3] Consider the Source: The Impact of Social Mixing on Drylot Housed Steer Behavior and Productivity
    Daigle, Courtney L.
    Sawyer, Jason E.
    Cooke, Reinaldo F.
    Jennings, Jenny S.
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (18):
  • [4] Impact of sociometric status on brush utilization in environmentally-enriched, feedlot
    Meneses, Xandra Christine A.
    Park, Rachel M.
    Daigle, Courtney L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 97 : 249 - 249
  • [5] The effect of anthelmintic resistance on the productivity in feedlot cattle
    Fazzio, L. E.
    Sanchez, R. O.
    Streitenberger, N.
    Galvan, W. R.
    Giudici, C. J.
    Gimeno, E. J.
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2014, 206 (3-4) : 240 - 245
  • [6] Subsequent effects of an environmental enrichment in the early fattening stage of beef cattle on their behavior, physiology and productivity
    Ishiwata, T.
    Uetake, K.
    Abe, N.
    Eguchi, Y.
    Tanaka, T.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2004, 82 : 360 - 360
  • [7] Subsequent effects of an environmental enrichment in the early fattening stage of beef cattle on their behavior, physiology and productivity
    Ishiwata, T.
    Uetake, K.
    Abe, N.
    Eguchi, Y.
    Tanaka, T.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2004, 87 : 360 - 360
  • [8] Subsequent effects of an environmental enrichment in the early fattening stage of beef cattle on their behavior, physiology and productivity
    Ishiwata, T.
    Uetake, K.
    Abe, N.
    Eguchi, Y.
    Tanaka, T.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2004, 83 : 360 - 360
  • [9] Effect of sprinkling on feedlot microclimate and cattle behavior
    T. L. Mader
    M. S. Davis
    J. B. Gaughan
    International Journal of Biometeorology, 2007, 51 : 541 - 551
  • [10] Effect of sprinkling on feedlot microclimate and cattle behavior
    Mader, T. L.
    Davis, M. S.
    Gaughan, J. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2007, 51 (06) : 541 - 551