Environmental Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration

被引:16
作者
Scherer, Maxi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bruce, Stuart [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Reschke, Juliane [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Law, London, England
[2] Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, Int Arbitrat Dispute Resolut & Energy Law, London, England
[3] Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, London, England
[4] KPMG, Climate Risk & Decarbonisat Strategy, London, England
[5] Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, Litigat Controversy Dept, London, England
[6] Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, Int Arbitrat Practice Grp, London, England
[7] Hogan Lovells, Litigat Arbitrat & Employment Practice Grp, Munich, Germany
关键词
LAW;
D O I
10.1093/icsidreview/siab006
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Through design of international investment agreements, foreign investors may bring international claims against the States in which they invest, challenging domestic executive and regulatory measures, including those related to the environment and sustainable development. In contrast, host States are usually limited to defending claims brought against them. The capacity for a host State to bring an independent counterclaim has been tested in only a handful of cases, some of which involved environmental considerations. This article considers those cases and the potential for counterclaims to help enforce national and international objectives related to the environment. It does so by setting out the legal framework for counterclaims by host States, analyzing how jurisdiction, admissibility and causes of action involving environmental obligations under domestic and international law may be satisfied, and the attendant consequences for liability and compensation. It then considers the implications of counterclaims for future investment disputes, given the rapid development of international and domestic environmental law and policy, especially in the context of corporate governance, climate change and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 440
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Does International Commercial Arbitration Promote Foreign Direct Investment? [J].
Myburgh, Andrew ;
Paniagua, Jordi .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2016, 59 (03) :597-627
[32]   Treaty of Tordesillas Syndrome: Sovereignty &ITad Absurdum&IT and the South China Sea Arbitration [J].
Rossi, Christopher R. .
CORNELL INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL, 2017, 50 (02) :231-283
[33]   The 2016 Model Indian Bilateral Investment Treaty: A Critical Deconstruction [J].
Ranjan, Prabhash ;
Anand, Pushkar .
NORTHWESTERN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW & BUSINESS, 2017, 38 (01) :1-54
[34]   Recent Efforts to Curb Investment Treaty Shopping: How Effective Are They? [J].
Boehme, Bianca .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, 2021, 38 (04) :511-532
[35]   COMPLEX DESIGNERS AND EMERGENT DESIGN: REFORMING THE INVESTMENT TREATY SYSTEM [J].
Roberts, Anthea ;
St John, Taylor .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2022, 116 (01) :96-149
[36]   State liability for 'politically' motivated conduct in the investment treaty regime [J].
Bonnitcha, Jonathan ;
Williams, Zoe Phillips .
LEIDEN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2020, 33 (01) :77-100
[37]   Extractive separations: A Polanyian note on the international investment treaty regime [J].
Aitken, Rob .
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY, 2024, 20
[38]   POWER AND PERSUASION IN INVESTMENT TREATY INTERPRETATION: THE DUAL ROLE OF STATES [J].
Roberts, Anthea .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2010, 104 (02) :179-225
[39]   CLASH OF PARADIGMS: ACTORS AND ANALOGIES SHAPING THE INVESTMENT TREATY SYSTEM [J].
Roberts, Anthea .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2013, 107 (01) :45-+