How can trust be investigated? Drawing lessons from past experience

被引:94
作者
Goudge, J [1 ]
Gilson, L
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Ctr Hlth Policy, Sch Publ Hlth, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Hlth Econ & Financing Programme, London WC1E 7HT, England
关键词
trust; methods; measurement;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.071
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Although the concept of trust has gained popularity in public debate and academic analysis over recent years, it continues to be regarded by many as difficult to define and so to investigate. In this paper we provide guidance on how to conduct future work on trust in the health sector, by reviewing the methods used in earlier studies. The paper draws on a range of the available literature which investigates trust in different settings from a variety of disciplinary perspectives. The review suggests that appropriate definitions of trust are highly context dependent. Where little is known about how trust functions, qualitative research to explore how respondents view trust and 'trusted' behaviour is important in advance of quantitative investigation. The results of qualitative inquiry facilitate the development and refinement of hypotheses about how trust functions and can be used to generate questions for use in structured questionnaires. Quantitative inquiry is valuable because it allows larger scale investigation and generates data that can be used, for example, to assess the statistical significance of different determinants to overall levels of trust. The review indicates that trying to use existing data to answer a new research question, without ensuring that respondents' answers refer to the form of trust under investigation, may lead to the generation of use of inappropriate data. In this respect, it highlights the need to test pre-existing research tools to ensure that they remain valid and relevant and retain their reliability in different settings. Although there may appear to be common structural features of specific relationships that might allow international measurement tools to be developed for use in the same type setting across geographical locations, cultural differences might invalidate such tools. Specific investigation of such differences is, therefore, needed to explore the potential validity of international tools for investigating trust. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1439 / 1451
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]   Measuring patients' trust in their primary care providers [J].
Hall, MA ;
Zheng, BY ;
Dugan, E ;
Camacho, F ;
Kidd, KE ;
Mishra, A ;
Balkrishnan, R .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2002, 59 (03) :293-318
[22]   Trust in physicians and medical institutions: What is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? [J].
Hall, MA ;
Dugan, E ;
Zheng, BY ;
Mishra, AK .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2001, 79 (04) :613-+
[23]   How disclosing HMO physician incentives affects trust [J].
Hall, MA ;
Dugan, E ;
Balkrishnan, R ;
Bradley, D .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2002, 21 (02) :197-206
[24]   Trust in the medical profession: Conceptual and measurement issues [J].
Hall, MA ;
Camacho, F ;
Dugan, E ;
Balkrishnan, R .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2002, 37 (05) :1419-1439
[25]   Trust in political-administrative relations: The case of local authorities in Norway and Tanzania [J].
Jacobsen, DI .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (05) :839-853
[26]   The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust [J].
Kao, AC ;
Green, DC ;
Zaslavsky, AM ;
Koplan, JP ;
Cleary, PD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (19) :1708-1714
[27]   Crime: social disorganization and relative deprivation [J].
Kawachi, I ;
Kennedy, BP ;
Wilkinson, RG .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (06) :719-731
[28]   Value importance and value congruence as determinants of trust in health policy actors [J].
Kehoe, SM ;
Ponting, JR .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (06) :1065-1075
[29]  
Krupat E, 2001, J FAM PRACTICE, V50, P1057
[30]   THE DYADIC TRUST SCALE - TOWARD UNDERSTANDING INTERPERSONAL-TRUST IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS [J].
LARZELERE, RE ;
HUSTON, TL .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1980, 42 (03) :595-604