Evaluating Governance Arrangements and Decision Making for Natural Resource Management Planning: An Empirical Application of the Governance Systems Analysis Framework

被引:18
作者
Potts, Ruth [1 ]
Vella, Karen [2 ]
Dale, Allan [3 ]
Sipe, Neil [4 ]
机构
[1] Southern Cross Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Mil Rd, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] James Cook Univ, Cairns Inst, Cairns, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Geog Planning & Environm Management, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Cape York; case studies; decision-making outcomes; evaluation; governance arrangements; natural resource management; planning; wet tropics; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; AUSTRALIA; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1080/08941920.2016.1185557
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Governance continues to be a challenge in the management and conservation of natural resources. It is difficult to strategically address governance challenges without understanding the dynamics, capacities, and knowledge application of institutions within such governance systems. This article examines the use of Governance Systems Analysis (GSA) to compare, evaluate, and benchmark governance arrangements for regional natural resource management (NRM) planning. It is applied in two Australian regional NRM case studies in Cape York and the Wet Tropics. Our analysis of governance arrangements for NRM planning in the two regions finds that while they are structurally and functionally similar, they have different capacities for decision making about planning. The article concludes with a discussion of the usefulness and implications of using the GSA as an evaluative framework to analyze governance in regional NRM planning systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1325 / 1341
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Althaus C., 2007, The Australian policy handbook, V4th
[2]  
[Anonymous], SYSTEM CONCEPTS EVAL
[3]  
Australian National Audit Office, 1997, COMM NAT RES MAN ENV
[4]  
Australian National Audit Office, 2008, 21 AUSTR NAT AUD OFF
[5]   A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives [J].
Bellamy, JA ;
Walker, DH ;
McDonald, GT ;
Syme, GJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2001, 63 (04) :407-423
[6]   More is not always better Coping with ambiguity in natural resources management [J].
Brugnach, M. ;
Dewulf, A. ;
Henriksen, H. J. ;
van der Keur, P. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (01) :78-84
[7]  
Cavaye J., 2005, DEV CAPACITY ASSESSM
[8]  
Cleaver F., 2012, Development through bricolage: rethinking institutions for natural resource management
[9]   Evaluating collaborative natural resource management [J].
Conley, A ;
Moote, MA .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2003, 16 (05) :371-386
[10]  
Connick S., 2003, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, V46, P177, DOI 10.1080/0964056032000070987