Prognostic significance of lymph node involvement in middle and distal bile duct cancer

被引:55
作者
Sasaki, R
Takahashi, M
Funato, O
Nitta, H
Murakami, M
Kawamura, H
Suto, T
Kanno, S
Saito, K
机构
[1] Iwate Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg 1, Morioka, Iwate 0208505, Japan
[2] Iwate Prefectural Senmaya Hosp, Dept Surg, Morioka, Iwate, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1067/msy.2001.114555
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Although lymph node involvement is considered an important prognostic factor; a detailed analysis has not been, conducted in middle (Bm) and distal (Bi) bile duct cancer: Methods. The histopathology of resections taken from 59 patients with Bm and Bi disease (Bm, 33 patients; Bi, 26 patients) was examined. The prevalence of lymph node involvement and its relationship to recurrence and prognosis were investigated. Survival rates were investigated according to the number of metastatic lymph nodes found, the TNM nodal stages, and the nodal stage classifications of The General Rules of the Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery. Results. The frequency of nodal involvement in Bm and Bi was 45.5% and 30.8%, respectively. A significant correlation existed between a patient's prognosis and his TNM nodal stage, Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery nodal stage, and the number of metastatic lymph nodes found (P <.0001, respectively). Among 8 sites of postoperative recurrence, metastasis occurred most frequently in the liver (16/23). Patients with nodal involvement had a significantly higher rate of liver metastasis (10/23) than those without it (6/36) (P =.024). Conclusions. The number of metastatic lymph nodes found in patients with Bm or Bi cancer and the nodal stage of their nodes, are significant prognostic indicators. Patients with nodal involvement are at high risk for liver metastasis in Bm and Bi disease.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 683
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF THE NUMBER OF POSITIVE LYMPH-NODES IN GASTRIC-CARCINOMA [J].
ADACHI, Y ;
KAMAKURA, T ;
MORI, M ;
BABA, H ;
MAEHARA, Y ;
SUGIMACHI, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (03) :414-416
[2]  
BEAHRS OH, 1992, MANUAL STAGING CANC, P93
[3]  
Doglietto GB, 2000, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V47, P349
[4]   EVALUATION OF AGGRESSIVE SURGERY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE EXTRA-HEPATIC BILE-DUCTS [J].
EVANDER, A ;
FREDLUND, P ;
HOEVELS, J ;
IHSE, I ;
BENGMARK, S .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1980, 191 (01) :23-29
[5]   Outcome of treatment for distal bile duct cancer [J].
Fong, Y ;
Blumgart, LH ;
Lin, E ;
Fortner, JG ;
Brennan, MF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (12) :1712-1715
[6]   BILE-DUCT CARCINOMA - DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT [J].
GIBBY, DG ;
HANKS, JB ;
WANEBO, HJ ;
KAISER, DL ;
TEGTMEYER, CJ ;
CHANDLER, JG ;
JONES, RS .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1985, 202 (02) :139-144
[7]   CHANGING TRENDS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EXTRAHEPATIC CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA [J].
GUTHRIE, CM ;
HADDOCK, G ;
DEBEAUX, AC ;
GARDEN, OJ ;
CARTER, DC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (11) :1434-1439
[8]   Practical grouping of positive lymph nodes in pancreatic head cancer treated by an extended pancreatectomy [J].
Ishikawa, O ;
Ohigashi, H ;
Sasaki, Y ;
Kabuto, T ;
Furukawa, H ;
Nakamori, S ;
Imaoka, S ;
Iwanaga, T ;
Kasugai, T .
SURGERY, 1997, 121 (03) :244-249
[9]  
*JAP SOC BIL SURG, 1997, GEN RUL SURG PATH ST
[10]   NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAPLAN, EL ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) :457-481