What comes after picking pollution intensive low-hanging fruits? Transfer direction of environmental regulation in China

被引:32
作者
Ju, Keyi [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhou, Dejin [1 ]
Wang, Qunwei [3 ,4 ]
Zhou, Dequn [3 ,4 ]
Wei, Xiaozhuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Econ & Management, Zhenjiang 212003, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, China Energy Grp, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, 29 Jiangjun Rd, Nanjing 211106, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Res Ctr Soft Energy Sci, 29 Yudao St, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green total factor productivity; Environmental regulation; Super-EBM; Pollution intensive industrial sectors; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; GREEN PRODUCTIVITY; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; INNOVATION; COMPETITIVENESS; GROWTH; EFFICIENCY; ECONOMY; TRANSFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120405
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental regulation has played an important role in energy conservation and emissions reduction. In the context of a worsening environment, the Chinese government has realized the disadvantages of extensive development and has launched a full range of actions for energy-intensive and heavy-polluting industrial sectors, which are called "low-hanging fruits." However, this principle has challenges, such as bottlenecks in emissions reduction and development restrictions in certain sectors. To solve these problems, this paper divides 37 industries into heavy-, middle-, and low-polluting industrial sectors according to a pollution intensive index. Subsequently, three types of environmental regulation measurements (mandatory control environmental regulation, market incentive environmental regulation, and voluntary compliance environmental regulation) are applied to verify the heterogeneous effects of environmental regulations on the green total factor productivity. In this study, super-epsilon-based measure model and global Malmquist-Luenberger index are used to calculate the green total factor productivity of these industries. Thus, a better understanding of environmental regulations in regards to polluting industrial sectors is provided. The results show that different types of environmental regulations exhibit heterogeneous effects on the green total factor productivities of different polluting industrial sectors. The relationship between the mandatory control environmental regulation/market incentive environmental regulation and the green total factor productivity for heavy-polluting industries is shown to be an inverse U shape that crosses an inflection point, indicating that the environmental regulation intensity of heavy-polluting industry is sufficient, perhaps even excessive. Notably, the relationship between the three environmental regulations and the middle-polluting industries all present a U shape, and the environmental regulation intensities are far away from the inflection point. In that regard, excessive regulation may lead to high operating costs and may burden low-polluting industrial sectors. In such cases, strengthening the environmental regulations for middle-polluting industries should be an efficient and reasonable way to achieve a win-win direction for both environmental protection and economic development. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms [J].
Albrizio, Silvia ;
Kozluk, Tomasz ;
Zipperer, Vera .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 :209-226
[2]  
APEC Energy Working Group, 2012, EN PERF EV METH DEV
[3]   Bridging radial and non-radial measures of efficiency in DEA [J].
Avkiran, Necmi Kemal ;
Tone, Kaoru ;
Tsutsui, Miki .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2008, 164 (01) :127-138
[4]   Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models [J].
Blundell, R ;
Bond, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 87 (01) :115-143
[5]   The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Firm and Country Competitiveness: A Meta-analysis of the Porter Hypothesis [J].
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Tubb, Adeline .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2018, 5 (02) :371-399
[6]   THE RATE OF RETURN REGULATED VERSION OF FARRELL EFFICIENCY [J].
FARE, R ;
LOGAN, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1992, 27 (02) :161-165
[7]   Evaluating the efficiency of industrial environmental regulation in China:A three-stage data envelopment analysis approach [J].
Feng, Mei ;
Li, Xinyi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 242
[8]  
Ferjani A., 2011, AGR EC REV, V12, p44e55
[9]   Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation [J].
Gray, WB ;
Shadbegian, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (03) :384-402
[10]   Sample splitting and threshold estimation [J].
Hansen, BE .
ECONOMETRICA, 2000, 68 (03) :575-603