Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances

被引:20
作者
Lai, Joanna Y. F. [2 ]
Guo, Y. P. [1 ]
Or, Peggy P. L. [2 ]
Li, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Inst Text & Clothing, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Nursing, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Health care worker; infection control; glove doffing; fluorescent stain; training and supervision; ACUTE-RESPIRATORY-SYNDROME; RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; HEALTH-CARE WORKERS; CONTACT; INFECTION; SARS; TRANSMISSION; HOSPITALS; UNITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Gloves are a necessary contact precaution to prevent transmission of infectious pathogens that spread by direct or indirect contact with an infected person or a contaminated environment. This article reports a study investigating hand and environmental contamination levels when health care workers (HCWs) followed two different methods of removing gloves at two distances from the rubbish bin. Methods: Fifty HCWs performed a personal or causal glove removal method (pretest) and a Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-recommended glove removal method (posttest) at distances of 2 feet and 3 feet from the rubbish bin after the application of fluorescent solution (the simulated contaminant) onto their gloved hands. Results: The incidence of the small patch of fluorescent stain (<1 cm(2)) on the front of the doffed gloves was significantly lower in the posttest than in the pretest. The incidence of small and large patches (>1 cm(2)) on the front of the doffed gloves and on the cover of the rubbish bin was significantly lower at 3 feet than at 2 feet. Health care assistants had significantly higher levels of contamination than other HCWs in the pretest but not in the posttest. There was no significant difference in hand contamination rate between pretest and posttest based on distance from the rubbish bin and type of HCW. Conclusion: The impact of the glove removal procedure and the distance to the bin in which used gloves are discarded should be taken into consideration on a daily basis, along with the supervision of infection control measures by minor staff.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 111
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Acquisition of nosocomial pathogens on hands after contact with environmental surfaces near hospitalized patients [J].
Bhalla, A ;
Pultz, NJ ;
Gries, DM ;
Ray, AJ ;
Eckstein, EC ;
Aron, DC ;
Donskey, CJ .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 25 (02) :164-167
[2]   Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force [J].
Boyce, JM ;
Pittet, D .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 23 (12) :S3-S40
[3]   Environmental contamination makes an important contribution to hospital infection [J].
Boyce, John M. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2007, 65 :50-54
[4]  
*CDCP, MDRO GUID MAN MULT R
[5]  
*CDCP, DONN PERS PROT EQ
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GUID IS PREC PREV TR
[7]   Possible SARS coronavirus transmission during cardiopulmonary resuscitation [J].
Christian, MD ;
Loutfy, M ;
McDonald, C ;
Martinez, KF ;
Ofner, M ;
Wong, T ;
Wallington, T ;
Gold, WL ;
Mederski, B ;
Green, K ;
Low, DE .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 10 (02) :287-293
[8]  
DOEBBELING BN, 1988, ANN INTERN MED, V109, P194
[9]  
Ford LC., 1996, NURSE PRACTITIONERS, P425
[10]  
HARTSTEIN AI, 1995, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V16, P405