Environmental performance assessment: A comparison and improvement of three existing social housing projects

被引:6
作者
Velazquez Robles, Jani F. [1 ]
Coloma Pico, Eloi [1 ]
Amin Hosseini, S. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Escuela Tecn Super Arquitectura, ETSAB, Barcelona, Spain
[2] RESUME TECH, Amer St, Barcelona, Spain
来源
CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS | 2022年 / 5卷
关键词
Green design; Social housing; Sustainability indicators; Environmental performance; BUILDING STOCK; CONSTRUCTION; SUSTAINABILITY; INDICATORS; RENOVATION; IMPACTS; KPIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cesys.2022.100077
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The energy consumption of buildings accounts for 22% of total global energy use and 13% of global greenhouse gas emissions. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the environmental performance of three social housing designs located in emerging economies by analysing sustainability indicators adopting different technical solutions. The analysis incorporates eleven construction strategies to improve the environmental performance of the buildings. The performance assessment is analysed by using EDGE (Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies) Methodology. Therefore, this study aims to help identify the construction strategies, with the aim of improving the operational energy performance (kWh/year/m(2)floor), operational CO2 emissions (tCO(2)eq/Year/m(2)floor), embodied energy (MJ/m(2)floor) and operational water consumption of housing (m(3)/year/m(2)floor). The results showed that when the technical measures are implemented, the energy demand decreases by 38.52% in Case A, 19% in Case B, and 41% in Case C. The embodied energy savings in materials in Case A 3%, Case B 0% and Case C 36% Regarding water consumption, the demand decreases by 46%, 4%, and 12% in Case A, B, and C respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [51] Structural sustainability appraisal in BIM
    Oti, A. H.
    Tizani, W.
    Abanda, F. H.
    Jaly-Zada, A.
    Tah, J. H. M.
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2016, 69 : 44 - 58
  • [52] Pandelaki E., 2010, INT J HOUSING SCI, V34, P233
  • [53] Construction Matters Comparing Environmental Impacts of Building Modular and Conventional Homes in the United States
    Quale, John
    Eckelman, Matthew J.
    Williams, Kyle W.
    Sloditskie, Greg
    Zimmerman, Julie B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 (02) : 243 - 253
  • [54] Rakhra A.S., 1983, SOME EC ASPECTS REHA, P77
  • [55] Initial metrics and pilot program results for measuring the performance of the Canadian construction industry
    Rankin, Jeff
    Fayek, Aminah Robinson
    Meade, Gerry
    Haas, Carl
    Manseau, Andre
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2008, 35 (09) : 894 - 907
  • [56] Roberts M, 2009, REV CONSTR, V8, P69
  • [57] Rodriguez Cedillo C., 2009, CASA FLEXIBLE 1972 M
  • [58] Roger H., 2007, HVAC SYSTEM EFFICIEN
  • [59] Schneider T., 2017, FLEXIBLE HOUSING
  • [60] Performance measurement of R and D projects in a multi-project, concurrent engineering environment
    Pillai, A.Sivathanu
    Joshi, A.
    Rao, K.Srinivasa
    [J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2002, 20 (02) : 165 - 177