Highway maintenance marginal costs: What if the fourth power assumption is not valid?

被引:7
作者
Anani, Shadi B. [1 ]
Madanat, Samer M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Inst Transportat Studies, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Marginal cost; Highway maintenance; Traffic loading units;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.05.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Highway maintenance marginal costs have been estimated in the literature using the perpetual overlay indirect approach. This approach uses the equivalent single axle load (ESAL) as the unit for traffic loading, which implies that pavement deterioration caused by an axle is proportional to the fourth power of the axle weight. This paper answers the following question: how inaccurate are maintenance marginal cost estimates when a highway agency uses ESAL? We find that the inappropriate use of ESAL does not affect the sum of maintenance marginal cost prices paid by all vehicles (at current equilibrium); however, it impacts distribution among vehicles, which reduces equity and efficiency. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 495
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
ANANI SB, 2008, THESIS U CALIFORNIA
[2]   Development of a pavement rutting model from experimental data [J].
Archilla, AR ;
Madanat, S .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2000, 126 (04) :291-299
[3]  
BRUZELIUS N, 2004, MEDDELANDE SWEDISH N, V963
[4]  
Doll C, 2008, Report Produced within the Study Internalisation Measures and Policies for All External Cost of Transport (IMPACT)-Deliverable 2
[5]   Economic impact of the introduction of the German HGV toll system [J].
Doll, Claus ;
Schaffer, Axel .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2007, 14 (01) :49-58
[6]  
GULER I, 2010, ESTIMATION STOCHASTI
[7]  
Johnsson R., 2004, TRANSPORT POLICY, V11, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2004.04.002
[8]  
Lindberg G., 2002, MARGINAL COST ROAD M
[9]  
Lu Q., 2002, Truck Traffic Analysis using Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) Data in California
[10]   Government plans for lorry road-user charging in the UK: a critique and an alternative [J].
McKinnon, Alan C. .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2006, 13 (03) :204-216