Creating a Patient-Centered Imaging Service: Determining What Patients Want

被引:79
作者
Basu, Pat A. [1 ]
Ruiz-Wibbelsmann, Julie A. [1 ]
Spielman, Susan B. [1 ]
Van Dalsem, Volney F., III [1 ]
Rosenberg, Jarrett K. [1 ]
Glazer, Gary M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
关键词
CT; direct communication; MRI; outpatient imaging facility; patient satisfaction; survey; COMMUNICATION; NOTIFICATION; SATISFACTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; SYSTEM; ACT;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.10.5333
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to determine patients' preferences for how, from whom, and how soon they receive imaging results. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Hard copies of our survey were randomly distributed to patients at an academic medical center outpatient imaging facility for 9 weeks, during August through October 2008, to collect data regarding patient preferences for how they received results ("Method"), from whom ("Person"), and how quickly ("Speed"). RESULTS. A total of 129 (23%) of 557 patients (47.4% male; median age, 55 years) undergoing CT (62%) and MRI (38%) completed the survey. According to survey responses, results needed to be communicated within a few hours for an "acceptable" rating from 95% of patients. Thirty-one percent preferred to receive normal results by the fastest method, whereas 35% preferred to receive abnormal results by telephone. Patients did not show an overwhelming preference regarding which physician communicates the results. More than 25% of patients were indifferent as to who was giving the results and cared only about the speed of delivery. For normal results, 12% chose from the radiologist, 41% from the referring physician, 14% from both, and 33% from whoever is faster (p < 0.0001). For abnormal results, 6% chose from the radiologist, 41% from the referring physician, 27% from both, and 26% from whoever is faster (p < 0.0002). CONCLUSION. Patients in our study wanted their results communicated much sooner than is currently practiced. Optimizing patient satisfaction may require a new communication model.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 610
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Communicating results of all radiologic examinations directly to patients: Has the time come?
    Berlin, Leonard
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (06) : 1275 - 1282
  • [2] Communicating Results of All Outpatient Radiologic Examinations Directly to Patients: The Time Has Come
    Berlin, Leonard
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (03) : 571 - 573
  • [3] Communication: The Needs of the Patient Come First
    Berquist, Thomas H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (03) : 557 - 559
  • [4] Patient-centered Radiology: Use It or Lose It!
    Brandt-Zawadski, Michael
    Kerlan, Robert K., Jr.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (05) : 521 - 523
  • [5] Capaccio E, 2010, INSIGHTS IMAGING, V1, P83, DOI 10.1007/s13244-009-0003-1
  • [6] Efficiency of a semiautomated coding and review process for notification of critical findings in diagnostic imaging
    Choksi, VR
    Marn, CS
    Bell, Y
    Carlos, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (04) : 933 - 936
  • [7] Failure to Recognize and Act on Abnormal Test Results: The Case of Screening Bone Densitometry
    Cram, Peter
    Rosenthal, Gary E.
    Ohsfeldt, Robert
    Wallace, Robert B.
    Schlechte, Janet
    Schiff, Gordon D.
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2005, 31 (02) : 90 - 97
  • [8] EISENBERG RL, 1992, RADIOLOGY ILLUSTRATE, P58
  • [9] Communication: The key to improved patient care
    Fritzsche, PJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (01) : 13 - 14
  • [10] The role of a consultant radiologist-are patients still in the dark?
    Grant, L.
    Griffin, N.
    McDonald, S.
    Vargas, H.
    Hampson, F.
    Vasconcelos, J. C.
    Sinnatamby, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (10) : 2326 - 2332