Participatory selection of ecosystem services for spatial planning: Insights from the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, Portugal

被引:35
作者
Mascarenhas, Andre [1 ,2 ]
Ramos, Tomas B. [1 ]
Haase, Dagmar [2 ,3 ]
Santos, Rui [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nova Lisboa, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, Dept Ciencias & Engn Ambiente, CENSE Ctr Environm & Sustainabil Res, P-1200 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Humboldt Univ, Dept Geog, Lab Landscape Ecol, Berlin, Germany
[3] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Ecosystem services; Spatial planning; Stakeholder engagement; Governance; Participation; LAND-USE CHANGE; SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS; LANDSCAPE; STAKEHOLDERS; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; VALUATION; PROVISION; PERCEPTIONS; ASSESSMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.011
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ES) assessments have been undergoing rapid developments. Despite considerable advancements it is still difficult to comprehensively assess a large suite of ES, often requiring a selection of the most relevant ones. However, documented and tested procedures to select ES, particularly through participatory processes, are scarce. The aim of this research is to explore the participatory selection of ES, illustrated with the case of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area in Portugal, southwestern Europe. Drawing from a spatial planning context, different types of stakeholders were involved through a combination of participatory techniques. It was possible to identify differences in stakeholders' ES selection, while at the same time arriving at a set of priority ES and linking them with spatial planning goals that entail potential effects on ES. The strengths of the approach include the use of different participatory techniques, of drivers that help translating plans and of an existing ES classification system to support it. On the other hand, the exploratory nature of the research meant that a limited range of types of stakeholders was covered. The participatory approach developed in this research has the potential to be adapted for ES selection in other planning contexts or in strategic environmental assessments. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 99
页数:13
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [11] Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how?
    Bryan, Brett A.
    Raymond, Christopher M.
    Crossman, Neville D.
    Macdonald, Darla Hatton
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2010, 97 (02) : 111 - 122
  • [12] Bryson J. M., 2004, Public Manag. Rev., V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1080/14719030410001675722
  • [13] Caetano M., 2009, CORINE Land Cover 2006 for Continental Portugal
  • [14] Campo S., 2009, Revista Internacional Sostenibilidad, Tecnologia y Humanismo, V4, P125
  • [15] Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: A landscape-scale spatial analysis
    Castro, Antonio J.
    Verburg, Peter H.
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    Cabello, Javier
    Vaughn, Caryn C.
    Lopez, Enrique
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2014, 132 : 102 - 110
  • [16] Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Guerry, Anne D.
    Balvanera, Patricia
    Klain, Sarah
    Satterfield, Terre
    Basurto, Xavier
    Bostrom, Ann
    Chuenpagdee, Ratana
    Gould, Rachelle
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Hannahs, Neil
    Levine, Jordan
    Norton, Bryan
    Ruckelshaus, Mary
    Russell, Roly
    Tam, Jordan
    Woodside, Ulalia
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2012, 62 (08) : 744 - 756
  • [17] Costa E. M., 2009, P 5 INT C VIRT CIT T
  • [18] Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making
    de Groot, R. S.
    Alkemade, R.
    Braat, L.
    Hein, L.
    Willemen, L.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) : 260 - 272
  • [19] EEA, 2011, EXP FRAM EC CAP ACC
  • [20] European Commission, 2013, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE