Arguing;
bargaining;
European Convention;
intergovernmental conferences;
negotiations;
COMMUNICATIVE ACTION;
INTERNATIONAL-COOPERATION;
DECISION-MAKING;
EUROPEAN CONVENTION;
HABERMAS;
SOCIALIZATION;
INFORMATION;
ENLARGEMENT;
LEGITIMACY;
LEADERSHIP;
D O I:
10.1080/13501761003748716
中图分类号:
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号:
0302 ;
030201 ;
摘要:
The past decade witnessed a growing interest in theories of deliberation and their application at the international level. This article takes stock of the state of the art. It argues that the 'deliberative turn' has forced both rationalist and constructivist scholars to refine their arguments and reconsider their methodology. We argue that the new research frontier for constructivists is in assessing under which circumstances arguments affect negotiating actors' preferences and subsequently lead to outcomes that are not easily explained in pure bargaining terms.
机构:
Rutgers State Univ, Philosophy Dept, SPH, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
Rutgers State Univ, IFH, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USARutgers State Univ, Philosophy Dept, SPH, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
机构:
Rutgers State Univ, Philosophy Dept, SPH, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
Rutgers State Univ, IFH, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USARutgers State Univ, Philosophy Dept, SPH, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA