Group discussion as interactive dialogue or as serial monologue: The influence of group size

被引:108
作者
Fay, N
Garrod, S
Carletta, J
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Dept Psychol, Human Commun Res Ctr, Glasgow G12 9YR, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9280.00292
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Current models draw a broad distinction between communication as dialogue and communication as monologue. The two kinds of models have different implications for who influences whom in a group discussion. If the discussion is like interactive dialogue, group members should be influenced most by those with whom they interact in the discussion; if it is like serial monologue, they should be influenced most by the dominant speaker. The experiments reported here show that in small, 5-person groups, the communication is like dialogue and members are influenced most by; those with whom they interact in the discussion. However in large,10-person groups, the communication is like monologue and members are influenced most by the dominant speaker The difference in mode of communication is explained in terms of how speakers in the two sizes of groups design their utterances for different audiences.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 486
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL
[2]   CHANNELS OF COMMUNICATION IN SMALL GROUPS [J].
Bales, Robert F. ;
Strodtbeck, Fred L. ;
Mills, Theodore M. ;
Roseborough, Mary E. .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1951, 16 (04) :461-468
[3]  
CHERRY EC, 1956, HUMAN COMMUNICATION
[4]  
Clark H., USING LANGUAGE
[5]  
Clark Herbert H., 1982, Advances in psychology, P287, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0166-4115(09)60059-5
[6]   DIMENSIONS OF GROUP-PROCESS - AMOUNT AND STRUCTURE OF VOCAL INTERACTION [J].
DABBS, JM ;
RUBACK, RB .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 20 :123-169
[7]  
Dunbar K., 1996, NATURE INSIGHT, P365
[8]  
Fisher R.A., 1921, METRON, V1, P3, DOI DOI 10.1093/BIOMET/9.1-2.22
[9]   CONVERSATION, COORDINATION AND CONVENTION - AN EMPIRICAL-INVESTIGATION OF HOW GROUPS ESTABLISH LINGUISTIC CONVENTIONS [J].
GARROD, S ;
DOHERTY, G .
COGNITION, 1994, 53 (03) :181-215
[10]   SAYING WHAT YOU MEAN IN DIALOG - A STUDY IN CONCEPTUAL AND SEMANTIC COORDINATION [J].
GARROD, S ;
ANDERSON, A .
COGNITION, 1987, 27 (02) :181-218