Effect of Field Drainage on Seismic Pore Pressure Buildup and Kσ under High Overburden Pressure

被引:4
作者
Ni, M. [1 ]
Abdoun, T. [2 ,3 ]
Dobry, R. [4 ]
El-Sekelly, W. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Amazon Dev Ctr, POB 81226, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 110 8th St,JEC 4049, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[3] New York Univ Abu Dhabi, Dept Civil Engn, POB 129188, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[4] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 23 Mann Blvd, Clifton Pk, NY 12065 USA
[5] Mansoura Univ, Dept Struct Engn, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LOTUNG DOWNHOLE ARRAY; LIQUEFACTION RESISTANCE; SOILS; SHEAR;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002536
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper studies the effect of a high effective overburden pressure [sigma'(v0) = similar to 600 kPa (6 atm)] under two drainage conditions on the field liquefaction behavior of saturated Ottawa sand. A series of eight centrifuge experiments with relative densities D-r = 45% and 80% and base shaking are considered that include a 5-m saturated sand layer under a pressure of either sigma'(v0) = similar to 100 kPa (1 atm) or similar to 600 kPa (6 atm). Four of the tests had single drainage at the top of the layer (SD), whereas the other four tests had double drainage (DD) at top and bottom. The four SD test results had been reported before, whereas the four DD tests are new. A novel centrifuge technique was developed to achieve the double-drainage boundary condition of two pervious boundaries at the top and bottom of the sand layer, using a geocomposite at the bottom. Measured responses are compared at the same sigma'(v0) between SD and DD tests having the same input acceleration, as well as between SD and DD tests where the shaking induced a similar maximum excess pore pressure ratio (r(u))max approximate to 0.8. These comparisons include acceleration time histories, excess pore pressure time histories and profiles during and after shaking, and stress ratio and shear strain time histories. Comparisons between corresponding tests at similar to 100 and similar to 600 kPa (1 and 6 atm) revealed significantly more partial drainage at similar to 600 kPa (6 atm) than at similar to 100 kPa (1 atm), with even more significant variation in excess pore pressures in the DD than in the SD tests. Best estimates of field overburden pressure correction factors at -600 kPa (6 atm), K-sigma were obtained, were obtained from the centrifuge results with two independent methods for a failure criterion of (r(u))(max) = 0.8. Those K-sigma = 1.2-1.3 > 1.0 for both SD and DD drainage conditions due to the significantly lower compressibility of the sand at similar to 600 kPa (6 atm). The results further emphasize the important role partial drainage may play in the field during shaking at high sigma'(v0) on the excess pore pressures and values of K-sigma. (C) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Hynes ME, 1999, PHYSICS AND MECHANICS OF SOIL LIQUEFACTION, P145
  • [22] Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes
    Idriss, IM
    Boulanger, RW
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2006, 26 (2-4) : 115 - 130
  • [23] Idriss IM, 2010, Report No. UCD/CGM-10/02
  • [24] Londons Department of Science and Art of the Committee of Council on Educations, 1888, LIST BOOKS PAMPHLETS
  • [25] Montgomery J, 2012, UCDCGM1202
  • [26] Pore Pressure and Kσ Evaluation at High Overburden Pressure under Field Drainage Conditions. I: Centrifuge Experiments
    Ni, M.
    Abdoun, T.
    Dobry, R.
    Zehtab, K.
    Marr, A.
    El-Sekelly, W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (09)
  • [27] Reddi L., 2003, Seepage in Soils: Principles and Applications
  • [28] Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test
    Robertson, PK
    Wride, CE
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 35 (03) : 442 - 459
  • [29] Seed H.B., 1971, J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., V97, P1249, DOI [10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662, DOI 10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662]
  • [30] Seed H.B., 1981, SESSION SITU TESTING