Siting of a central healthcare waste incinerator using GIS-based Multi Criteria Decision Analysis

被引:68
作者
Hariz, Husna Ali [1 ]
Donmez, Cem Cagri [1 ]
Sennaroglu, Bahar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Dept Engn & Built Environm, Chelmsford, Essex, England
关键词
Incinerator siting; Healthcare waste; GIS; MCDA; AHP; VIKOR; PROMETHEE; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; LANDFILL SITE SELECTION; MULTICRITERIA; TURKEY; AREA; MANAGEMENT; TOPSIS; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.091
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research looks into the problem of poor healthcare waste management in Kenya. Most healthcare facilities lack enforcement of existing legislation for handling, and disposal of health care waste, an issue exacerbated by the fact that regulating bodies lack a systemized oversight plan of ensuring compliance. This paper suggests that setting up a centralized modern waste incinerator will facilitate in overcoming the problems outlined above. The study area for this study is Kilifi, a county which lies along the Kenyan Coast. The county has over 330 healthcare facilities. The main objective of this study was to identify a suitable area to build an incinerator to serve these facilities. A two stage analysis was employed to identify a suitable location. Geographical Information Systems (GIS) techniques were used to first screen the entire study area to eliminate unsuitable land that did not satisfy the eight economic, environmental and social criteria taken into account. In the second stage, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods were used to analyse and rank the potential sites. From the GIS analysis, it was found that only around 8.2% of the land was suitable. From this spatial analysis, eight potential sites were identified. These sites were then ranked using three MCDA methods, namely, AHP, VIKOR and PROMETHEE. This study differs from previous studies that use the GIS-MCDA model, in that three MCDA methods each with a different mode of operation was used. This was for the sake of performing a comparison on the results and to determine if there would be significant differences especially with regard to the best ranked site. Interestingly, the methods all identified 'site 6', an area near the urban town of Malindi as the most suitable. The rest of the rankings were almost consistent across all three methods. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1042
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: a literature review [J].
Achillas, Charisios ;
Moussiopoulos, Nicolas ;
Karagiannidis, Avraam ;
Banias, Georgias ;
Perkoulidis, George .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2013, 31 (02) :115-129
[2]  
Allsopp M, 2011, INCINERATION HUMAN H
[3]  
Alzamili H.H., 2015, INT J SCI ENG RES, V6, P1330, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.4883.2480
[4]   Solid waste disposal methodology selection using multi-criteria decision making methods and an application in Turkey [J].
Arikan, Emre ;
Simsit-Kalender, Zeynep Tugce ;
Vayvay, Ozalp .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 :403-412
[5]  
Bickel S, 2007, ENV GUIDELINESS SMAL
[6]   Multi-criteria GIS-based siting of transfer station for municipal solid waste: The case of Kumasi Metropolitan Area, Ghana [J].
Bosompem, Christian ;
Stemn, Eric ;
Fei-Baffoe, Bernard .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (10) :1054-1063
[7]   An integrated multi-criteria decision analysis and inexact mixed integer linear programming approach for solid waste management [J].
Cheng, S ;
Chan, CW ;
Huang, GH .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2003, 16 (5-6) :543-554
[8]  
County Kilifi, 2013, 1 KIL COUNT INT DEV
[9]  
Development & Training Services, 2012, ENV COMPL HLTH CAR W
[10]   Optimizing landfill site selection by using land classification maps [J].
Eskandari, M. ;
Homaee, M. ;
Mahmoodi, S. ;
Pazira, E. ;
Van Genuchten, M. Th. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2015, 22 (10) :7754-7765