RMS Delay Spread vs. Coherence Bandwidth from 5G Indoor Radio Channel Measurements at 3.5 GHz Band

被引:21
作者
Debaenst, Wout [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Feys, Arne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cuinas, Inigo [1 ,2 ]
Garcia Sanchez, Manuel [1 ,2 ]
Verhaevert, Jo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vigo, Dept Signal Theory, Vigo 36310, Spain
[2] Univ Vigo, Commun AtlanTT Res Ctr, Vigo 36310, Spain
[3] Univ Ghent, IMEC, Dept Informat Technol, IDLab, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
indoor propagation; modelling; radio propagation; ray-tracing; MULTIPATH CHANNELS; BUILDING-MATERIALS; PROPAGATION; FREQUENCY; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.3390/s20030750
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Our society has become fully submersed in fourth generation (4G) technologies, setting constant connectivity as the norm. Together with self-driving cars, augmented reality, and upcoming technologies, the new generation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices is pushing the development of fifth generation (5G) communication systems. In 5G architecture, increased capacity, improved data rate, and decreased latency are the objectives. In this paper, a measurement campaign is proposed; we focused on studying the propagation properties of microwaves at a center frequency of 3.5 GHz, commonly used in 5G cellular networks. Wideband measurement data were gathered at various indoor environments with different dimensions and characteristics. A ray-tracing analysis showed that the power spectrum is dominated by the line of sight component together with reflections on two sidewalls, indicating the practical applicability of our results. Two wideband parameters, root mean square delay spread and coherence bandwidth, were estimated for the considered scenarios, and we found that they are highly dependent on the physical dimension of the environment rather than on furniture present in the room. The relationship between both parameters was also investigated to provide support to network planners when obtaining the bandwidth from the delay spread, easily computed by a ray-tracing tool.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Path Loss and RMS Delay Spread Model for 5G Channel at 19 GHz
    Al-Samman, Ahmed M.
    Abd Rahman, Tharek
    Hadri, Marwan
    Hindia, M. H. D. Nour
    2017 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING & ITS APPLICATIONS (CSPA), 2017, : 49 - 54
  • [2] Characterizing the Indoor Industrial Channel at 3.5GHz for 5G
    Adegoke, E. I.
    Edwards, R. M.
    Whittow, W. G.
    Bindel, A.
    2019 WIRELESS DAYS (WD), 2019,
  • [3] Measurements and Modelling of Millimeter-Wave Channel at 28 GHz in the Indoor Complex Environment for 5G Radio Systems
    Li, Shuangde
    Liu, Yuanjian
    Chen, Zhipeng
    Sun, Xiangchen
    Lin, Leke
    2017 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (WCSP), 2017,
  • [4] Induced Effects of Moving People in an Indoor Radio Channel at sub-6 GHz 5G Bands
    Sanchez, Manuel Garcia
    Cuinas, Inigo
    Feys, Arne
    Debaenst, Wout
    Verhaevert, Jo
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION AND NORTH AMERICAN RADIO SCIENCE MEETING, 2020, : 1249 - 1250
  • [5] Comprehensive FR1(C) and FR3 Lower and Upper Mid-Band Propagation and Material Penetration Loss Measurements and Channel Models in Indoor Environment for 5G and 6G
    Shakya, Dipankar
    Ying, Mingjun
    Rappaport, Theodore S.
    Poddar, Hitesh
    Ma, Peijie
    Wang, Yanbo
    Al-Wazani, Idris
    IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF THE COMMUNICATIONS SOCIETY, 2024, 5 : 5192 - 5218
  • [6] Indoor Office Wideband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Channel Models at 28 and 73 GHz for Ultra-Dense 5G Wireless Networks
    MacCartney, George R.
    Rappaport, Theodore S.
    Sun, Shu
    Deng, Sijia
    IEEE ACCESS, 2015, 3 : 2388 - 2424