Accuracy of MRI in the detection of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:212
作者
Rosen, EL
Blackwell, KL
Baker, JA
Soo, MS
Bentley, RC
Yu, DH
Samulski, TV
Dewhirst, MW
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Div, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Oncol, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Radiat Phys Div, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.181.5.1811275
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. This study was undertaken to evaluate the ability of MRI to accurately show residual primary breast malignancy in women treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-one patients with locally advanced primary breast carcinoma underwent contrast-enhanced MRI before and after treatment with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. For each patient, the maximum extent of the MRI abnormality was measured both before and after treatment. These measurements were subsequently compared with physical examination findings and histologic results to determine the ability of MRI to accurately reveal tumor extent after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS. MRI after chemotherapy showed a correlation coefficient of 0.75 with histology, which was better than physical examination (r = 0.61). MRI underestimated the extent of residual tumor in two patients by more than 1 cm (including one false-negative examination), was within 1 cm in 12 of 21 patients, and overestimated tumor extent by more than I cm in seven of 21 patients. CONCLUSION. MRI can show residual malignancy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy better than physical examination, particularly in patients who have not had a complete clinical response to therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1282
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]  
Harms SE, 1999, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V10, P991, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199912)10:6<991::AID-JMRI16>3.0.CO
[12]  
2-3
[13]   Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Hayes, C ;
Padhani, AR ;
Leach, MO .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2002, 15 (02) :154-163
[14]   MR IMAGING OF THE BREAST WITH GD-DTPA - USE AND LIMITATIONS [J].
HEYWANG, SH ;
WOLF, A ;
PRUSS, E ;
HILBERTZ, T ;
EIERMANN, W ;
PERMANETTER, W .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (01) :95-103
[15]   Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies [J].
Ikeda, DM ;
Hylton, NM ;
Kinkel, K ;
Hochman, MG ;
Kuhl, CK ;
Kaiser, WA ;
Weinreb, JC ;
Smazal, SF ;
Degani, H ;
Viehweg, P ;
Barclay, J ;
Schnall, MD .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (06) :889-895
[16]   MR IMAGING OF THE BREAST - FAST IMAGING SEQUENCES WITH AND WITHOUT GD-DTPA - PRELIMINARY-OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAISER, WA ;
ZEITLER, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (03) :681-686
[17]  
Kong G, 1999, INT J HYPERTHER, V15, P345, DOI 10.1080/026567399285558
[18]   Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: Features and positive predictive value [J].
Liberman, L ;
Morris, EA ;
Lee, MJY ;
Kaplan, JB ;
LaTrenta, LR ;
Menell, JH ;
Abramson, AF ;
Dashnaw, SM ;
Ballon, DJ ;
Dershaw, DD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (01) :171-178
[19]   SENSITIVITY OF HYPERTHERMIA TRIAL OUTCOMES TO TEMPERATURE AND TIME - IMPLICATIONS FOR THERMAL GOALS OF TREATMENT [J].
OLESON, JR ;
SAMULSKI, TV ;
LEOPOLD, KA ;
CLEGG, ST ;
DEWHIRST, MW ;
DODGE, RK ;
GEORGE, SL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 25 (02) :289-297
[20]   MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer [J].
Orel, SG ;
Schnall, MD .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) :13-30